Page 148 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 148
Chapter 8
Moreover, although Plantinga’s model shows that evidential arguments are not required
– –
Concluding Summary
antinga’s (extended) A/C model.
Brinks’ article argues that Plantinga’s Plantinga’s objection is the
Brinks, C.L., ‘On Nail Scissors and Toothbrushes: Responding to the Philosophers’ Critiques of icism,’ Religious Studies
WCB
Bartholomew, ‘Warranted Biblical Interpretation,’ and G storical Biblical Criticism?’
WCB, 386; see also Plantinga’s response to Batholomew and Gordon: Plantinga, ‘Reason and ’
146
8.7 Brinks68
