Page 125 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 125
Theological Responses to Plantinga’s A/C Model – James Beilby
render one’s Christian belief
Second, something similar can be said about positive arguments supporting one’s personal to me Plantinga’s model. This personal aspect th
Third, we have to remember that Plantinga’s model essentially deals with the de jure de jure de facto de facto de facto curs, does not render Plantinga’s model invalid in the basic. Plantinga’s argument is that theistic and Christian oncern over the properly basic nature of belief in Plantinga’s model is due to
interaction between the IIHS, as described by Plantinga, and the believer’s native faculty process
Epistemology as Theology 200; Beilby, ‘Plantinga’s Model of Warranted Christian
7.2.5 The IIHS and the Role of the Believer
Belief,’ 151
123
7
