Page 124 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 124
Chapter 7
me.” Beilby’s theological argument.
Beilby’s theological reason “belief in God may cycle back and what might be called ‘developmental’ issues associated with faith.”
“Even if there is a final moment in which via the internal instigation of the conviction be completely divorced (epistemically speaking) from one’s uments and experiential grounds.”
someone’s Christian belief. Following Plantinga’s model, this would is an objection against Plantinga’s model. I would offer the following points to support this
WCB
Epistemology as Theology
Epistemology as Theology WCB
Epistemology as Theology WCB See also Beilby, ‘Plantinga’s Model of Warranted Christian Belief,’ 150.
122
