Page 116 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 116
Chapter 7
WCB
to do is to give “a recommendation as to belief to have.” “the most disturbing problem for Plantinga’s religious epistemology.”
The problem is that Beilby interprets Plantinga’s language of paradigmatic to a limited number of believers. Although Plantinga’s language may give thi ‘ ’ ‘ ’ Strictly speaking, the phrase ‘paradigmatic faith’ does not necessarily include the notion of ‘ideal’ in the sense of ‘strong’ faith.
Response to Beilby’s Objection
‘ ’
Epistemology as Theology 5; Beilby, ‘Plantinga’s Model of Warranted Christian Belief,’ 143
WCB
WCB claim to have warrant as it fails to meet the necessary conditions; McNabb, ‘Warranted Religion: Answering Objections to Alvin Plantinga’s Epistemology.’
WCB
Epistemology as Theology, 131; Beilby, ‘Plantinga’s Model of Warranted Christian Belief,’
Epistemology as Theology WCB
Epistemology as Theology, 135; Beilby, ‘Plantinga’s Model of Warranted Christian Belief,’
WCB
114
