Page 114 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 114
Chapter 7
what he perceives as Plantinga’s rather negative appreciation of the role of arguments
process faculty the role of the believer’s innat or native (Beilby’
The presence of these problems does not mean that Plantinga’s model needs a
I will now discuss Beilby’s r
compensate Plantinga’s theological minima
7.2 Evaluation of the A/C Model of Warranted Christian Belief
7.2.1 The Applicability of the Model: Paradigmatic versus Typical Believers
Beilby’s main objection is what he calls Plantinga’s focus on ‘paradigmatic’ or ‘ideal’ WCB s that Plantinga talks about paradigmatic believers with “fully formed and well
Beilby’s Objection
Epistemology as Theology 203, 210; Beilby, ‘Plantinga’s Model of Warranted Christian Belief,’ 148.
Epistemology as Theology, 211; Beilby, ‘Plantinga’s Model of Warranted Christian Belief,’
Epistemology as Theology 112
