Page 141 - Children’s mathematical development and learning needs in perspective of teachers’ use of dynamic math interviews

Effect of dynamic math interviews on mathematics teaching
Opfer, V., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academic Press.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. 2nd ed. Princeton University Press.
Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Suk Yoon, K. (2000). Does professional development change teaching practice? Results from a three-year study.U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/pubs/edpubs.html.
Prast, E. J., Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2018). Teaching students with diverse achievement levels: Observed implementation of differentiation in primary mathematics education. In E. Prast, Differentiation in primary mathematics education (pp. 53–79). Utrecht University.
Reynolds, D., & Muijs, D. (1999). The effective teaching of mathematics: A review of research. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 273–288. https://doi. org/10.1080/13632439969032
Seethaler, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Predicting first graders’ development of calculation versus word-problem performance: The role of dynamic assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0024968
Tripp, T. R., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2012.01.011
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Van de Grift, W. (2007). Quality of teaching in four European countries: A review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument. Educational Research, 49(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701369651
Van der Lans, R. M., Van de Grift, W. J. M., & Van Veen, K. (2018). Developing an instrument for teacher feedback: Using the Rasch model to explore teachers’ development of effective teaching strategies and behaviors. The Journal of Quasi-experimental Education, 86(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1268086
Van Driel, J., Meirink, J., Van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.738020
Van Luit, J. E. H. (2019). Diagnostics of dyscalculia. In A. Fritz, V. G. Haase, & P. Räsänen (Eds.), International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties: From the laboratory to the classroom (pp. 653–668). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_38
Wilkins, J. L. M. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 11(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9068-2
Wright, R. J., Martland, J., & Stafford, A. (2006). Early numeracy: Assessment for teaching and intervention. 2nd ed. Paul Chapman Publications/Sage.
4
139