Page 139 - Children’s mathematical development and learning needs in perspective of teachers’ use of dynamic math interviews

Effect of dynamic math interviews on mathematics teaching
References
Allsopp, D. H., Kyger, M. M., Lovin, L. A., Gerretson, H., Carson, K. L., & Ray, S. (2008). Mathematics dynamic assessment: Informal assessment that responds the needs of struggling learners in mathematics. Council for Exceptional Children, 40(3), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990804000301
Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Characteristics of effective teaching of mathematics: A view from the West. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 147–164. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/228743535
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https:// doi. org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Bannink, F. (2010). 1001 Solution-focused questions. Handbook for solution-focused interviewing. 2nd ed. W.W. Norton & Company.
Borko, H., Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Seago, N. (2011). Using video representations of teaching in practice-based professional development programs. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(1), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0302-5
Caffrey, E., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). The predictive validity of dynamic assessment: A review. The Journal of Special Education, 41(4), 254–270. https://doi. org/10.1177/0022466907310366
Carney, M., Brendefur, J., Thiede, K., Hughes, G., & Sutton, J. (2016). Statewide mathematics professional development: Teacher knowledge, self-efficacy, and beliefs. Educational Policy, 30(4), 539–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814550075
Chang, Y. L. (2015). Examining relationships among elementary mathematics teachers’ efficacy and their students’ mathematics self-efficacy and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1307–1320. https://doi. org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1387a
Charalambous, C. Y. (2015). Working at the intersection of teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs, and teaching practice: A multiple-case study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9318-7
Delfos, M. F. (2001). Are you listening to me? Communicating with children from four to twelve years old. SWP Publishers.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181– 200. https://doi.org/0.3102/0013189X08331140
Deunk, M., Smale-Jacobse, A., De Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. (2018). Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002
Dudley, P. (2013). Teacher learning in Lesson Study: What interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34(2), 107–121. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.006
Emerson, J., & Babtie, P. (2014). The dyscalculia assessment. 2nd ed. Bloomsbury Education.
Forgasz, H. J., & Cheeseman, J. (2015). Effective and inclusive mathematics teaching and learning. In J. M. Deppeler, T. Loreman, R. Smith, & L. Florian (Eds)., Inclusive pedagogy across the curriculum (pp. 73–97). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi. org/10.1108/s1479-363620150000007011
Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689. https://doi. org/10.3102/00028312038003653
4
137