Page 154 - Demo

Chapter 5152Figure 4. Replicated significant interactions between self-report measures and categories of facial expressions in predicting emotion recognition task outcomes (Experiment 1 on the left and Experiment 2 on the right). Asterisks indicate robust negative/positive slopes for specific emotion categories in the slope comparison against zero. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence boundaries. Predicted accuracy and predicted confidence are on a scale from 0-1, while perceived emotional intensity is centred and scaled, with 0 representing the mean and 1 representing the value at 1 SD. Figure 5. Non-replicated significant interactions between self-report measures and categories of facial expressions in predicting emotion recognition task outcomes in Experiment 1 (A) and Experiment 2 (B+C). Asterisks indicate robust negative/positive slopes for specific emotion categories in the slope comparison against zero. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence boundaries. Predicted accuracy and predicted confidence are on a scale from 0-1, while perceived emotional intensity is centred and scaled, with 0 representing the mean and 1 representing the value at 1 SD. Replication: Exploratory Analyses Experiment 1As in Experiment 1, we observed a significant interaction between Trait interoceptive accuracy and Emotion category, F(1,4835) = 14.28, p < .001, in the model with Perceived emotional intensity as an outcome (see Figure 4D and Table S19 in the