Page 83 - Peri-implant health: the effect of implant design and surgical procedure on bone and soft tissue stability

Implant brand
Surface
Baseline radiograph time
Mean implant bone loss (mm)
Standard deviation bone loss (mm)
Implant survival rate %
Surface roughness
4
LONG-TERM EFFECT OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND PATIENTS' FACTORS ON CRESTAL BONE LOSS AT DENTAL IMPLANTS. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Straumann Straumann
Xive Straumann Xive Biomet/3I Nobel Biocare Nobel Biocare Nobel Biocare Unknown Certain Prevail Nobel Biocare
Nobel Biocare
Nobel Biocare
Nobel Biocare
Mixed Straumann Astra Tech Straumann
Straumann Straumann
3i
SLA SLA
Xive
SLA
Xive Osseotite TiUnite TiUnite TiUnite Unknown Osseotite Mixed
Mixed
Mixed
Mixed
Mixed TPS TiOblast TPS
TPS TPS
1 2.20 0.90 1 2.10 1.00
1 1.80 0.65 1 0.77 0.66 0 1.44 0.78 0 1.57 1.10 0 1.29 0.20 0 1.33 0.20 0 1.51 1.00 0 1.98
0 0.97 0.39 1 0.60 0.46
1 0.60 0.47 1 0.60 0.47 1 0.40 0.50
1 0.99
1 0.18 0.88 1 0.30 0.72 0 0.75 0.88
0 1.14 1.11 0 0.98 1.22
unknown 3
unknown 3
98.30% 4 96.70% 3 99.40% 4 92.10% 2
100.00% 3 100.00% 3 97.10% 3 94.90% unknown 97.10% 2 94.90% mixed
100.00% mixed 97.60% mixed 100.00% mixed
98.74% mixed 99.40% 4 99.00% 3 96.60% 4
92.70% 4 90.00% 4
(p = prospective; r = retrospective), mean follow-up (years), number of patients and implants at baseline, implants at follow-up, mean implant bone loss (mm) and standard deviation, implant survival rate (%) and surface roughness (1 = unknown or mixture of surfaces, 2 = smooth, 3 = moderately rough, 4 = rough)
81