Page 124 - Peri-implant health: the effect of implant design and surgical procedure on bone and soft tissue stability
P. 124
CHAPTER 5
■ RESULTS
Study Population
A sample size of 14 patients for each study was calculated. Hence, minimums of 20 patients (= 40 implants) were consequently included to anticipate future dropouts.
Twenty-six patients in study I were initially treated with one equicrestally (group 1) and one subcrestally (group 2) placed implant. In study II, 23 patients were initially treated with one implant with a moderately rough implant neck (group 3) and one implant with a minimally rough implant neck (group 4). In total four experimental treatment groups were assessed. After a follow-up of at least three years, one patient was excluded, due to anatomical constraints requiring deviation of the surgical protocol. Two patients were excluded after starting smoking and one did not respond to the follow-up invitation. Hence, 45 patients with two implants each were available after a follow-up of three years and none of the implants had failed (survival 100%). A flowchart of the patients’ distribution is shown in Figure 2. The study population consisted of 24 men and 21 women with a mean age at implant placement of 64 years (SD = 9.25, range = 43–85).
Figure 2: Flowchart of both study populations
122
