Page 34 - Impact of implant retained overdenture treatment and speech, oromyofunction, social participation and quality of life.
P. 34

Chapter 1
                  32
Table 1. continued Authors
Purpose the study
Subjects and methods
Results
Heydecke al. (2004)
et
Assessment of the influence
of different prosthetic designs on speech.
n: 30
Perceptual analysis of speech (two nonprofessional raters evaluated speech samples)
Trial 1:
- More correctly pronounced consonants with OD compared to FID in maxilla - More problems in fricatives compared to stops.
Sansone et al. (2006)
Evaluation of oromyofunctional behavior and speech after treatment
n: 14 : 8
: 6
Perceptual analysis of speech (examinator not specified)
- 7,1% (1/14) had /s/ sigmatism in all phases of the treatment
with FID in the mandibula.
Timing/ adaptation time: - Pre-surgery
- 1 month after surgery - 4 months after surgery
Trial 1: patients wore both IOD and FID on 6 implants in the maxilla (crossover).
- n1: 15 :8 :7
- No difference in pronunciation of vocals.
mandibula: IOD maxilla:
- IOD
- FID
Trial 2 :
- Mandibular restauration had no influence on speech. - Addition of palate had no influence on speech.
Trial 2: patients wore both IOD with and without palate on 4 implants in the maxilla (crossover).
Questionnaire satisfaction
- IOD had a higher score compared to FID.
- n2: 15 :7 :8
mandibula: FID
maxilla:
- IOD without palate
- IOD with palate Within-subject crossover design
Adaptation time: 2 months
(41j-78j)


























































   32   33   34   35   36