Page 185 - DECISION-MAKING IN SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY PATIENT OUTCOME, HOSPITAL COSTS, AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
P. 185

Informed consent in patients with an inability to provide consent
24. Cnossen MC, Polinder S, Lingsma HF, Maas AI, Menon D, Steyerberg EW. Variation in structure and process of care in traumatic brain injury: provider profiles of European neurotrauma centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study. Plos One 2016;11:1. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161367.
25. Steyerberg E, Wiegers E, Sewalt C, Buki A, Citerio G, De Keyser V, et al. Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2019;18(10):923-34. DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30232-7.
26. International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF). Available at: https://www.incf.org/ [Accessed October 8, 2019].
27. United Nations. “Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (M49)” Available at: https://unstats. un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/. [Accessed October 8, 2019].
28. Convention on the protection of human rights and human dignity in connection with the application of biology and medicine: Convention on human rights and biomedicine - ETS no. 164. Chapter 5, Article 17.6
29. Convention on the protection of human rights and human dignity in connection with the application of biology and medicine: Convention on human rights and biomedicine - ETS no. 164. Chapter 5, Article 17.2
30. Johnson-Greene D. Informed consent issues in traumatic brain injury research: current status of capacity assessment and recommendations for safeguards. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010; 25: 145–50. DOI: 10.1097/ HTR.0b013e3181d8287d.
31. Feng KL, Person C, Phillips-Sabol J, Williams B, Cai C, Jacobs AN et al. Comparison between a standardized questionnaire and expert clinicians for capacity assessment in stroke clinical trials. Stroke 2014; 45: e229-32. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006395.
32. Barrett KA, Ferguson ND, Athaide V, Cook DJ, Friedrich JO, McDonald E, et al. Surrogate decision makers’ attitudes towards research decision making for critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1616–23. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2625-x.
33. Ciroldi M, Cariou A, Adrie C, Annane D, Castelain V, Cohen Y. Ability of family members to predict patient’s consent to critical care research. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 807–13. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0582-6.
34. Shepherd V, Hood K, Sheehan M, Griffith R, Wood F. ‘It’s a tough decision’: a qualitative study of proxy decision-making for research involving adults who lack capacity to consent in UK. Age Ageing 2019; 48: 903–9. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz115.
35. Long B, Clark L, Cook P. Surrogate decision making for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Nurs 2011; 18: 204–12. DOI: 10.1097/JTN.0b013e31823a453a.
36. Hall DE, Prochazka AV, Fink AS. Informed consent for clinical treatment. CMAJ. 2012;184(5):533–40. 8 DOI:10.1503/cmaj.112120.
37. Topolovec-Vranic J, Santos M, Baker AJ, Smith OM, Burns KE. Deferred consent in a minimal-risk study involving critically ill subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Can Respr J 2014;21:293-6. DOI:10.1155/2014/719270.
38. Honarmand K, Belley-Cote EP, Ulic D, Khalifa A, Gibson A, McClure G, et al. The deferred consent model in prospective observational study evaluating myocardial injury in the intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med
2018;33:475-80. DOI: 10.1177/0885066616680772.
39. Shamy MCF, Dewar B, Chevrier S, Wang CQ, Page S, Goyal M, et al. Deferral of consent in acute stroke trials.
Lessons from the ESCAPE trial. Stroke 2019; 50:1017-20. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024096.
40. Woolfall K, Frith L, Gamble C, Gilbert R, Mok Q, Young B, et al. How parents and practitioners experience research without prior consent (deferred consent) for emergency research involving children with life threatening conditions: a mixed method survey. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008522. DOI: 10.1136/
bmjopen-2015-008522.
41. Eltorki M, Uleryk E, Freedman SB. Waiver of informed consent in pediatric resuscitation research: a systematic
review. Ac Emerg Med 2013; 20:822-34. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12180.
42. Duffett M, Burns KE, Kho ME, Lauzier F, Meade MO, Arnold DM, et al. Consent in critical care trials: a survey
of Canadian research ethics boards and critical care researchers. J Crit Care 2011;26:533.e11-533.e22. DOI:
10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.12.009.
43. Chico V. The impact of the General data Protection Regulation on health research. Br Med Bull
2018;128:109-18. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldy038.
44. Rumbold JM, Pierscionek B. The Effect of the General Data Protection Regulation on Medical Research. J Med
Internet Res. 2017;19(2):e47. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7108.
45. Clarke N, Vale G, Reeves EP, Kirwan M, Smith D, Farell M. GDPR: an impediment to research? Ir J Med Sci.
2019; 188(4):1129-35. DOI:10.1007/s11845-019-01980-2.
46. Van Veen, E.B. Observational health research in Europe: understanding the General Data Protection
Regulation and underlying debate. Eur J Cancer 2018;104:70-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.032.
47. Tisherman SA, Powell JL, Schmidt TA, Aufderheide TP, Kudenchuk PJ, Spence J, et al. Regulatory challenges for the resuscitation outcomes consortium. Circulation 2008; 118:1585–92. DOI: 10.1161/
 CIRCULATIONAHA.107.764084.
183






























































   183   184   185   186   187