Page 184 - DECISION-MAKING IN SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY PATIENT OUTCOME, HOSPITAL COSTS, AND RESEARCH PRACTICE

Chapter 8
REFERENCES
1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2018; 2019
2. Grady C, Cummings SR, Rowbotham MC, McConnell MV, Ashley EA, Kang G. Informed Consent. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 856–67. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1603773.
3. Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC OJ L158:1–76: 2014.
4. Mirr MP. Decisions made by family members of patients with severe head injury. ACCN 1991;2:242-51. DOI:10.4037/15597768-1991-2009.
5. Gigon F, Merlani P, Chenaud C, Ricou B. ICU research: The impact of invasiveness on informed consent. Intens Care Med 2013;39(7):1282-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-2908-x.
6. Abramson NS, Meisel A, Safar P. Deferred Consent: A New Approach for Resuscitation Research on Comatose Patients. JAMA 1986; 255: 2466–71. DOI:10.1001/jama.255.18.2466.
7. Wrigley A. Proxy consent: moral authority misconceived. J Med Ethics 2007; 33: 527–31. DOI:10.1136/ jme.2006.019711.
8. Ciroldi M, Cariou A, Adrie C, Annane D, Castelain V, Cohen Y, et al. Ability of family members to predict patient’s consent to critical care research. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 807–13. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007- 0582-6.
9. Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 493–7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.493.
10. Jansen TC, Kompanje EJO, Bakker J. Deferred proxy consent in emergency critical care research: Ethically valid and practically feasible. Crit Care Med 2009;37:(Suppl.):65–68. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181920851.
11. Department of Health and Human Services F and Drug Administration. Protection of Human Subjects; Informed Consent and Waiver of Informed Consent Requirements in Certain Emergency Research; Final Rules. Fed Regist 1996; Volume 61, Number 192: 51498–531.
12. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Sec. 50.24 Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research. Code Fed Regul Title 21, Vol I, Subchapter A, Part 50, Subpart B.
13. Kompanje EJO, Maas AIR, Menon DK, Kesecioglu J. Medical research in emergency research in the European Union member states: Tensions between theory and practice. Intens Care Med 2014;40:496-503. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3243-6
14. Van Belle G, Mentzelopoulos SD, Aufderheide T, May S, Nichol G. International variation in policies and practices related to informed consent in acute cardiovascular research: Results from a 44 country survey. Resuscitation 2015;91:76-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.029.
15. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. OJ L121:34: 2001.
16. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data OJ L281:31–50: 1995.
17. Regulation (EU) No 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) OJ L119:1–88: 2016.
18. European Union GDPR. “Processing of special categories of personal data”. OJ L119:Ch. 2 Art. 9. 2016.
19. Timmers M, Van Veen EB, Maas AIR, Kompanje EJO. Will the EU data protection regulation 2016/679 inhibit
critical care research? Med Law Rev 2019;27:59–78. DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwy023.
20. Ecarnot F, Quenot JP, Besch G, Piton G. Ethical challenges involved in obtaining consent for research from patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5(suppl):S41. DOI: 10.21037/
atm.2017.04.42.
21. Burns KEA, Zubrinich C, Tan W, Raptis S, Xiong W, Smith O, et al. Research recruitment practices and
critically ill patients. A multicenter, Cross-sectional study (The Consent Study). Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2013;187:1212-7. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1537OC.
22. Maas AIR, Menon DK, Steyerberg EW, Citerio G, Lecky F, Manley GT et al. Collaborative European
NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): a prospective longitudinal
observational study. Neurosurgery 2015;76(1):67–80. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000575.
23. QuesGen Systems, Inc. Available at: https://www.quesgen.com/ [Accessed October 8, 2019].
182