Page 146 - DECISION-MAKING IN SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY PATIENT OUTCOME, HOSPITAL COSTS, AND RESEARCH PRACTICE
P. 146

Chapter 6
35. Quinn T, Moskowitz J, Khan MW, et al. What families need and physicians deliver: Contrasting communication preferences between surrogate decision-makers and physicians during outcome prognostication in critically ill TBI patients. Neurocrit Care 2017;27:154-162.
36. Detsky ME, Harhay MO, Bayard DF, et al. Discriminative accuracy of physician and nurse predictions for survival and functional outcomes 6 months after an icu admission. JAMA 2017; 317:2187-2195.
37. Letsinger J, Rommel C, Hirschi R, et al. The aggressiveness of neurotrauma practitioners and the influence of the impact prognostic calculator. PLoS One2017; 12:e0183552.
38. van Veen E, van der Jagt M, Cnossen MC, et al. Brain death and postmortem organ donation: Report of a questionnaire from the CENTER-TBI study. Crit Care 2018;22:306.
39. Lesieur O, Genteuil L, Leloup M. A few realistic questions raised by organ retrievalin the intensive care unit. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5:S44.
40. ** Rohaut B, Eliseyev A, Claassen J. Uncovering consciousness in unresponsive ICU patients: Technical, medical and ethical considerations. Crit Care 2019; 23:78. Comprehensive overview of unconscious ICU patients which is highly informative for clinical practice. It also discusses medical and ethical considerations including prognostication and medical decision-making which are especially difficult in this particular patient category.
41. ** Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2018; 91:450. One of the most important recent articles regarding disorders of consciousness. It contains a summary of the latest guideline recommendations.
42. Bruno MA, Majerus S, Boly M, et al. Functional neuroanatomy underlying the clinical subcategorization of minimally conscious state patients. J Neurol 2012;259:1087-1098.
43. Honeybul S, Ho KM, Gillett GR. Long-term outcome following decompressive craniectomy: An inconvenient truth? Curr Opin Crit Care 2018; 24:97-104.
44. Olivecrona M, Honeybul S. A study of the opinions of Swedish healthcare personnel regarding acceptable outcome following decompressive hemicraniectomy for ischaemic stroke. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160:95-101.
45. Ho KM. Predicting outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury: Science, humanityor both? J Neurosurg Sci 2018; 62:593-598.
46. Rousseau MC, Baumstarck K, Alessandrini M, et al. Quality of life in patients with locked-in syndrome: Evolution over a 6-year period. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2015;10:88.
47. Andrews JG, Wahl RA. Duchenne and becker muscular dystrophy in adolescents: Current perspectives. Adolesc Health Med Ther 2018; 9:53-63.
48. * Span-Sluyter CAMFH, Lavrijsen JCM, van Leeuwen E, et al. Moral dilemmas and conflicts concerning patients in a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: Shared or non-shared decision making? A qualitative study of the professional perspective in two moral case deliberations. BMC Medical Ethics 2018; 19:10. This study discusses several important moral dilemmas and conflicts in patients in an unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. These considerations could also be useful for physicians not necessarily confronted with this particular patient subgroup.
49. Kompanje EJ. Prognostication in neurocritical care: Just crystal ball gazing?Neurocrit Care 2013; 19:267-268.
50. Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: Integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16:987- 1048.
51. Collaborators MCT, Perel P, Arango M,et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 2008; 336:425-429.
52. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med 2008; 5:e165.
53. * Moskowitz J, Quinn T, Khan MW, et al. Should we use the impact-model for the outcome prognostication of TBI patients? A qualitative study assessing physicians’ perceptions. MDM Policy Pract 2018; 3:2381468318757987. There are many different views on the use of prediction models like the IMPACT and CRASH models. This qualitative study assesses the perception of physicians.
54. ** Dijkland SA, Foks KA, Polinder S, et al. Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of contemporary models and validation studies. J Neurotrauma 2019. doi: 10.1089/ neu.2019.6401 This systematic review focuses on prognostication in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. Because this is a very important factor in clinical decision-making, an assessment of the validity of these models is very important.
144













































































   144   145   146   147   148