Page 79 - Quantitative Imaging of Small Tumours with Positron Emission Tomography

Chapter 3 22. Wolters EE, Golla SSV, Timmers T, et al. A novel partial volume correction method for accurate quantification of [(18)F] flortaucipir in the hippocampus. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:79. 23. Hunter CR, Klein R, Beanlands RS, deKemp RA. Patient motion effects on the quantification of regional myocardial blood flow with dynamic PET imaging. Med Phys. 2016;43:1829. 24. Wang T, Wu KY, Miner RC, Renaud JM, Beanlands RSB, deKemp RA. Reproducible quantification of cardiac sympathetic innervation using graphical modeling of carbon-11-meta-hydroxyephedrine kinetics with dynamic PET-CT imaging. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:63. 25. Tohka J, Reilhac A. Deconvolution-based partial volume correction in Raclopride-PET and Monte Carlo comparison to MR-based method. Neuroimage. 2008;39:1570-1584. 26. Christian BT, Vandehey NT, Floberg JM, Mistretta CA. Dynamic PET denoising with HYPR processing. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1147-1154. 27. Floberg JM, Mistretta CA, Weichert JP, Hall LT, Holden JE, Christian BT. Improved kinetic analysis of dynamic PET data with optimized HYPR-LR. Med Phys. 2012;39:3319-3331. 28. Frings V, van Velden FH, Velasquez LM, et al. Repeatability of metabolically active tumor volume measurements with FDG PET/CT in advanced gastrointestinal malignancies: a multicenter study. Radiology. 2014;273:539-548. 29. Mankoff DA, Dunnwald LK, Gralow JR, et al. Changes in blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1806-1814. 30. Teo BK, Seo Y, Bacharach SL, et al. Partial-volume correction in PET: validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:802-810. 31. Kim E, Shidahara M, Tsoumpas C, et al. Partial volume correction using structural-functional synergistic resolution recovery: comparison with geometric transfer matrix method. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:914-920. 32. Mourik JE, Lubberink M, Klumpers UM, Comans EF, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R. Partial volume corrected image derived input functions for dynamic PET brain studies: methodology and validation for [11C]flumazenil. Neuroimage. 2008;39:1041-1050. 33. Sari H, Erlandsson K, Law I, et al. Estimation of an image derived input function with MR-defined carotid arteries in FDG-PET human studies using a novel partial volume correction method. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:1398-1409. 34. Boussion N, Cheze Le Rest C, Hatt M, Visvikis D. Incorporation of wavelet-based denoising in iterative deconvolution for partial volume correction in whole-body PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1064-1075. 35. Alavi A, Werner TJ, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Zaidi H. Correction for Partial Volume Effect Is a Must, Not a Luxury, to Fully Exploit the Potential of Quantitative PET Imaging in Clinical Oncology. Mol Imaging Biol. 2018;20:1-3. 36. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1:122S-150S. 37. Frings V, de Langen AJ, Smit EF, et al. Repeatability of metabolically active volume measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1870-1877. 38. Merlin T, Visvikis D, Fernandez P, Lamare F. Dynamic PET image reconstruction integrating temporal regularization associated with respiratory motion correction for applications in oncology. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:045012. 78