Page 221 - Emotions through the eyes of our closest living relatives- Exploring attentional and behavioral mechanisms

Appendix to results
Figure S4. Box plots of effects of Congruency (A, C) and Task Version (B, D) on the Adult PIAT (A-B) and Child PIAT (C-D) D-score averages. Task Version represents the three different stimulus sets used in this study. D-scores are significantly higher for participants who receive incongruent trials first (A, C). Furthermore, task version 1 in the child PIAT shows a lower D-score average than version 2 and 3 (D). Outliers are visualized with a circle. * p ≤ .05, ** p < .01. *** p < .001
20 20
Combined
Combined
Attributes only P- N N- P N- P P- N A
MN - PD NM - DP
MP - ND PM - DN
DP - NM PD - MN
DN - PM ND - MP
Appendices
Experiment 2: Online PIAT and WIAT
Appendix to procedure and results
Table S3. The randomization of starting positions for each block of the two IATs.
Block Type
1 Training
2 Training
3 Experimental
4 Experimental
5 Training 20
Trials
20 20
Tested
Concepts only Attributes only
Version 1
M- D N- P
Version 2
M- D P- N
Version 3
D- M P- N
Version 4
D- M N –P
6 Experimental
7 Experimental
20 20
Combined Combined
MP - ND PM - DN
MN - PD NM - DP
DN - PM ND - MP
DP - NM PD - MN
Each participant only completed
C = Dutch ethnicity concept, P = positive attribute and N = negative attribute.
one randomly assigned version for each IAT. M = Moroccan ethnicity concept,
219