Page 84 - Prevention and Treatment of Incisional Hernia- New Techniques and Materials
P. 84

Chapter 4
References
1. Alnassar S, Bawahab M, Abdoh A, Guzman R, Al Tuwaijiri T, Louridas G. Incisional hernia postrepair of abdominal aortic occlusive and aneurysmal disease:  ve-year incidence. Vascular. 2012;20(5):273- 7.
2. Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, Hoofwijk AG. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure. Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):633-9.
3. Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T, Cornish J, Harries R, Stimpson A, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Factors A ecting Midline Incisional Hernia Rates: Analysis of 14,618 Patients. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138745.
4. Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1254-60.
5. Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. [Factors in uencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years] Ein ussfaktoren der Narbenhernienentstehung. Retrospektive Untersuchung an 2.983 laparotomierten Patienten uber einen Zeitraum von 10 Jahren. Chirurg. 2002;73(5):474-80.
6. Gillion JF, Sanders D, Miserez M, Muysoms F. The economic burden of incisional ventral hernia repair: a multicentric cost analysis. Hernia. 2016.
7. van Ramshorst GH, Eker HH, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Impact of incisional hernia on health- related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. American journal of surgery. 2012;204(2):144-50.
8. Henriksen NA, Helgstrand F, Vogt KC, Jorgensen LN, Bisgaard T. Risk factors for incisional hernia repair after aortic reconstructive surgery in a nationwide study. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(6):1524-30, 30 e1-3.
9. Sorensen LT, Hemmingsen UB, Kirkeby LT, Kallehave F, Jorgensen LN. Smoking is a risk factor for incisional hernia. Arch Surg. 2005;140(2):119-23.
10. Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. 2015;19(1):1-24.
11. Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):843-56.
12. Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, et al. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg. 2009;249(4):576-82.
13. van ‘t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002;89(11):1350-6.
14. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzla  J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1-34.
15. Berretta R, Rolla M, Patrelli TS, Piantelli G, Merisio C, Melpignano M, et al. Randomised prospective study of abdominal wall closure in patients with gynaecological cancer. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(4):391-6.
16. Bresler L, Courbey PJ, Feldman L, Bilweiss J, Tortuyaux JM, Rauch P, et al. [Results of a controlled trial comparing 3 suture threads at slow resorption for the closure of supra-umbilical midline laparotomies]. Ann Chir. 1995;49(6):544-8.
17. Colombo M, Maggioni A, Parma G, Scalambrino S, Milani R. A randomized comparison of continuous versus interrupted mass closure of midline incisions in patients with gynecologic cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(5 Pt 1):684-9.
18. Deitel M, Alhindawi R, Yamen M, To TB, Burul CJ. Dexon plus versus Maxon fascial closure in morbid obesity: a prospective randomized comparison. Can J Surg. 1990;33(4):302-4.
19. Cameron AE, Parker CJ, Field ES, Gray RC, Wyatt AP. A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987;69(3):113-5.
82


































































































   82   83   84   85   86