Page 42 - Prevention and Treatment of Incisional Hernia- New Techniques and Materials

Chapter 2
References
1. Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, Henderson M, Fahey T, Rege RV, et al. Factors a ecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg. 2000;24(1):95-100;discussion 1.
2. Manninen MJ, Lavonius M, Perhoniemi VJ. Results of incisional hernia repair. A retrospective study of 172 unselected hernioplasties. Eur J Surg. 1991;157(1):29-31.
3. Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S, Kohler L, Fischer S, Troidl H. Unacceptable results of the Mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias. Eur J Surg. 1998;164(5):361-7.
4. Read RC, Yoder G. Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg. 1989;124(4):485-8.
5. van ‘t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002;89(11):1350-6.
6. Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. [Factors in uencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years] Ein ussfaktoren der Narbenhernienentstehung. Retrospektive Untersuchung an 2.983 laparotomierten Patienten uber einen Zeitraum von 10 Jahren. Chirurg. 2002;73(5):474-80.
7. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Overweight and healing of midline incisions: the importance of suture technique. Eur J Surg. 1997;163(3):175-80.
8. Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Jr., Reines HD, DeMaria EJ, Newsome HH, Lowry JW. Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am J Surg. 1996;171(1):80-4.
9. Adye B, Luna G. Incidence of abdominal wall hernia in aortic surgery. Am J Surg. 1998;175(5):400-2.
10. Stevick CA, Long JB, Jamasbi B, Nash M. Ventral hernia following abdominal aortic reconstruction. Am Surg. 1988;54(5):287-9.
11. Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, et al. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg. 2009;249(4):576-82.
12. Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Curr Surg. 2005;62(2):220-5.
13. Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S. Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 1998;176(6):666-70.
14. Rucinski J, Margolis M, Panagopoulos G, Wise L. Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta- analysis delineates the optimal technique. Am Surg. 2001;67(5):421-6.
15. Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJ, Jeekel J. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1987;74(8):738-41.
16. Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2000;231(3):436-42.
17. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg. 1993;80(10):1284-6.
18. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(2):125-9.
19. Jenkins TP. The burst abdominal wound: a mechanical approach. Br J Surg. 1976;63(11):873-6.
20. Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA. Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowl operations. Am J Surg. 1981;141(4):510-13.
21. Sanders RJ, DiClementi D. Principles of abdominal wound closure. II. Prevention of wound dehiscence. Arch Surg. 1977;112(10):1188-91.
22. Adamsons RJ, Musco F, Enquist IF. The chemical dimensions of a healing incision. Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics. 1966;123(3):515-21.
23. Campbell JA, Temple WJ, Frank CB, Huchcroft SA. A biomechanical study of suture pullout in linea alba. Surgery. 1989;106(5):888-92.
24. Carlson MA. Acute wound failure. The Surgical clinics of North America. 1997;77(3):607-36.
40