Page 282 - Prevention and Treatment of Incisional Hernia- New Techniques and Materials
P. 282

Chapter 13
References
1. Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg. 1998;133(4):378-82.
2. Engelsman AF, van Dam GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ. In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically di erent surgical meshes. Ann Surg. 2010;251(1):133-7.
3. Engelsman AF, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ. Morphological aspects of surgical meshes as a risk factor for bacterial colonization. Br J Surg. 2008;95(8):1051-9.
4. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2):86-100.
5. Kyriakides TR, Foster MJ, Keeney GE, Tsai A, Giachelli CM, Clark-Lewis I, et al. The CC chemokine ligand, CCL2/MCP1, participates in macrophage fusion and foreign body giant cell formation. Am J Pathol. 2004;165(6):2157-66.
6. Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, Allavena P, Sica A. Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 2002;23(11):549-55.
7. Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004;25(12):677-86.
8. Martinez FO, Gordon S, Locati M, Mantovani A. Transcriptional pro ling of the human monocyte- to-macrophage di erentiation and polarization: new molecules and patterns of gene expression. J Immunol. 2006;177(10):7303-11.
9. Benoit M, Desnues B, Mege JL. Macrophage polarization in bacterial infections. J Immunol. 2008;181(6):3733-9.
10. Brown BN, Ratner BD, Goodman SB, Amar S, Badylak SF. Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2012;33(15):3792- 802.
11. Cavallaro A, Lo Menzo E, Di Vita M, Zanghi A, Cavallaro V, Veroux PF, et al. Use of biological meshes for abdominal wall reconstruction in highly contaminated  elds. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(15):1928-33.
12. Hiles M, Record Ritchie RD, Altizer AM. Are biologic grafts e ective for hernia repair?: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov. 2009;16(1):26-37.
13. Primus FE, Harris HW. A critical review of biologic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs under contaminated conditions. Hernia. 2013.
14. Smart NJ, Marshall M, Daniels IR. Biological meshes: a review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs. Surgeon. 2012;10(3):159-71.
15. Deerenberg EB, Mulder IM, Grotenhuis N, Ditzel M, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Experimental study on synthetic and biological mesh implantation in a contaminated environment. Br J Surg. 2012;99(12):1734-41.
16. Mayer A, Lee S, Lendlein A, Jung F, Hiebl B. E cacy of CD14(+) blood monocytes/macrophages isolation: positive versus negative MACS protocol. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;48(1):57-63.
17. Grotenhuis N, Bayon Y, Lange JF, Van Osch GJ, Bastiaansen-Jenniskens YM. A culture model to analyze the acute biomaterial-dependent reaction of human primary macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013.
18. Dabrowiecki S, Svanes K, Lekven J, Grong K. Tissue reaction to polypropylene mesh: a study of oedema, blood  ow, and in ammation in the abdominal wall. Eur Surg Res. 1991;23(3-4):240-9.
19. Kaleya RN. Evaluation of implant/host tissue interactions following intraperitoneal implantation of porcine dermal collagen prosthesis in the rat. Hernia. 2005;9(3):269-76.
20. Deeken CR, Faucher KM, Matthews BD. A review of the composition, characteristics, and e ectiveness of barrier mesh prostheses utilized for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):566-75.
280


































































































   280   281   282   283   284