Page 261 - Prevention and Treatment of Incisional Hernia- New Techniques and Materials
P. 261
In ammatory response in a contaminated environment
References
1. Primus FE, Harris HW. A critical review of biologic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs under contaminated conditions. Hernia. 2013;17(1):21-30.
2. Choi JJ, Palaniappa NC, Dallas KB, Rudich TB, Colon MJ, Divino CM. Use of mesh during ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases: outcomes of 33,832 cases. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):176-80.
3. Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2):86-100.
4. Rosch R, Junge K, Schachtrupp A, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V. Mesh implants in hernia repair. In ammatory cell response in a rat model. Eur Surg Res. 2003;35(3):161-6.
5. Brown BN, Ratner BD, Goodman SB, Amar S, Badylak SF. Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2012;33(15):3792- 802.
6. Grotenhuis N, Vd Toom HF, Kops N, Bayon Y, Deerenberg EB, Mulder IM, et al. In vitro model to study the biomaterial-dependent reaction of macrophages in an in ammatory environment. Br J Surg. 2014;101(8):983-92.
7. Tang L, Jennings TA, Eaton JW. Mast cells mediate acute in ammatory responses to implanted biomaterials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(15):8841-6.
8. Orenstein SB, Saberski ER, Klueh U, Kreutzer DL, Novitsky YW. E ects of mast cell modulation on early host response to implanted synthetic meshes. Hernia. 2010;14(5):511-6.
9. Brodbeck WG, Macewan M, Colton E, Meyerson H, Anderson JM. Lymphocytes and the foreign body response: lymphocyte enhancement of macrophage adhesion and fusion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;74(2):222-9.
10. Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, Allavena P, Sica A. Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 2002;23(11):549-55.
11. Benoit M, Desnues B, Mege JL. Macrophage polarization in bacterial infections. J Immunol. 2008;181(6):3733-9.
12. van Putten SM, Wubben M, Plantinga JA, Hennink WE, van Luyn MJ, Harmsen MC. Endotoxin contamination delays the foreign body reaction. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;98(4):527-34.
13. Deerenberg EB, Mulder IM, Grotenhuis N, Ditzel M, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Experimental study on synthetic and biological mesh implantation in a contaminated environment. Br J Surg. 2012;99(12):1734-41.
14. Schreinemacher MH, van Barneveld KW, Dikmans RE, Gijbels MJ, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Coated meshes for hernia repair provide comparable intraperitoneal adhesion prevention. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(11):4202-9.
15. Engelsman AF, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ. Morphological aspects of surgical meshes as a risk factor for bacterial colonization. Br J Surg. 2008;95(8):1051-9.
16. Garcia-Pumarino R, Pascual G, Rodriguez M, Perez-Kohler B, Bellon JM. Do collagen meshes o er any bene ts over preclude(R) ePTFE implants in contaminated surgical elds? A comparative in vitro and in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(2):366-75.
17. Brown BN, Londono R, Tottey S, Zhang L, Kukla KA, Wolf MT, et al. Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(3):978-87.
18. Luttikhuizen DT, Harmsen MC, Van Luyn MJ. Cellular and molecular dynamics in the foreign body reaction. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(7):1955-70.
19. Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Functional and morphological evaluation of di erent polypropylene-mesh modi cations for abdominal wall repair. Biomaterials. 1998;19(24):2235-46.
20. Engelsman AF, van Dam GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ. In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically di erent surgical meshes. Ann Surg. 2010;251(1):133-7.
21. Amid PK. Classi cation of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997;1:15-21.
12
259