Page 246 - Prevention and Treatment of Incisional Hernia- New Techniques and Materials

Chapter 11
References
1. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, JN IJ, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. The New England journal of medicine. 2000;343(6):392-8.
2. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Annals of surgery. 2004;240(4):578-83; discussion 83-5.
3. Engelsman AF, van der Mei HC, Ploeg RJ, Busscher HJ. The phenomenon of infection with abdominal wall reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2007;28(14):2314-27.
4. Choi JJ, Palaniappa NC, Dallas KB, Rudich TB, Colon MJ, Divino CM. Use of mesh during ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases: outcomes of 33,832 cases. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):176-80.
5. PK A. Classi cation of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. 1997;1(1):15-21.
6. Muhl T, Binnebosel M, Klinge U, Goedderz T. New objective measurement to characterize the porosity of textile implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;84(1):176-83.
7. Halm JA, de Wall LL, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh hernia repair complicates subsequent abdominal surgery. World journal of surgery. 2007;31(2):423-9; discussion 30.
8. Burger JW, Halm JA, Wijsmuller AR, ten Raa S, Jeekel J. Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair. Surgical endoscopy. 2006;20(8):1320-5.
9. Reijnen MM, Holmdahl L, Kooistra T, Falk P, Hendriks T, van Goor H. Time course of peritoneal tissue plasminogen activator after experimental colonic surgery: e ect of hyaluronan-based antiadhesive agents and bacterial peritonitis. Br J Surg. 2002;89(1):103-9.
10. van ‘t Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonthuis F, Marquet RL, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, et al. Prevention of adhesion to prosthetic mesh: comparison of di erent barriers using an incisional hernia model. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):123-8.
11. Schreinemacher MH, Emans PJ, Gijbels MJ, Greve JW, Beets GL, Bouvy ND. Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model. The British journal of surgery. 2009;96(3):305-13.
12. Deerenberg EB, Mulder IM, Ditzel M, Slieker JC, Bemelman WA, Jeekel J, et al. Polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel decreases formation of adhesions in a rat model of peritonitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012;13(5):321-5.
13. Zuhlke HV, Lorenz EM, Straub EM, Savvas V. [Pathophysiology and classi cation of adhesions]. Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie Supplement II, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie Kongress. 1990:1009-16.
14. Rodgers KE, Schwartz HE, Roda N, Thornton M, Kobak W, diZerega GS. E ect of oxiplex* lms (PEO/ CMC) on adhesion formation and reformation in rabbit models and on peritoneal infection in a rat model. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(4):831-8.
15. van de Breevaart Bravenboer J, In der Maur CD, Bos PK, Feenstra L, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, et al. Improved cartilage integration and interfacial strength after enzymatic treatment in a cartilage transplantation model. Arthritis Res Ther. 2004;6(5):R469-76.
16. Engelsman AF, van Dam GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ. In vivo evaluation of bacterial infection involving morphologically di erent surgical meshes. Ann Surg. 2010;251(1):133-7.
17. Kelly ME, Behrman SW. The safety and e cacy of prosthetic hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds. Am Surg. 2002;68(6):524-8; discussion 8-9.
18. Ventral Hernia Working G, Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, et al. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery. 2010;148(3):544-58.
19. Harth KC, Broome AM, Jacobs MR, Blatnik JA, Zeinali F, Bajaksouzian S, et al. Bacterial clearance of biologic grafts used in hernia repair: an experimental study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2224-9.
244