Page 90 - Medical students’ self-regulated learning in clinical contexts

88
19. Pieschl S. Metacogni ve calibra on—an extended conceptualiza on and poten al applica ons. Metacogni on Learn 2009;4(1):3–31.
20. Winters D, Latham GP. The e ect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Gr Organ Manag 1996;21(2):236–250.
21. Seijts GH, Latham GP. The e ect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. J Organ Behav 2001;22(3):291–307.
22. Zumbrunn S, Tadlock J, Roberts ED. Encouraging self-regulated learning in the classroom : A review of the literature. Metropolitan Educa onal Research Consor um (MERC); 2011.
23. Spencer JA. Learning and teaching in the clinical environment. Br Med J 2003;326(7389):591–594.
24. Teunissen PW, Wilkinson TJ. Learning and teaching in workplaces. In: Dornan T, Mann K, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, editors. Medical educa on: Theory and Prac ce. Churchill-Livingstone; 2011. p. 195–197.
25. Steven K, Wenger E, Boshuizen HPA, Scherpbier AJJA, Dornan T. How clerkship students learn from real pa ents in prac ce se ngs. Acad Med 2014;89(3):469–476.
26. Woods NN, Mylopoulos M, Brydges R. Informal self-regulated learning on a surgical rota on: uncovering student experiences in context. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011;16(5):643– 653.
27. Teunissen PW. Experience, trajectories, and rei ca ons: an emerging framework of prac ce- based learning in healthcare workplaces. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2015;20(4):843-856.
28. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical educa on research. Med Educ 2010;44(4):358–366.
29. Charmaz K. Construc ng grounded theory: A prac cal guide through qualita ve research. London: Sage; 2006.
30. White CB. Smoothing out transi ons: how pedagogy in uences medical students’ achievement of self-regulated learning goals. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007;12(3):279–297.
31. Sungur S, Tekkaya C. E ects of problem-based learning and tradi onal instruc on on self- regulated learning. J Educ Res 2006;99(5):307–320.
32. Dolmans DHJM, De Grave W, Wol agen IHAP, van der Vleuten CPM. Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educa onal prac ce and research. Med Educ 2005;39(7):732–741.
33. Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruc on method. Science 2004;306 (5702):1776–1780.
34. Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schwarz N, Stone AA. The Day Reconstruc on Method (DRM): Instrument Documenta on; 2004. [Accessed on 01-06-2014]. Available from: h p://sitemaker. umich.edu/norbert.schwarz/ les/drm_documenta on_july_2004.pdf
35. Bowen GA. Grounded Theory and Sensi zing Concepts. Int J Qual Methods 2008;5(3):12–23.
36. Butler DL, Car er SC, Schnellert L, Gagnon F, Giammarino M. Secondary students’ self-regulated engagement in reading: Researching self-regula on as situated in context. Psychol Test 2011;53(1):73–105.