Page 132 - Diagnostic delay of endometriosis
P. 132
for four interventions. These interventions were rated higher by patients as compared to the professionals. The Kruskal-Wallis analysis showed a significant difference in rating between the subgroups of professionals for one intervention. Detailed results of the subgroup analysis are provided in Appendix C. Six interventions were labelled ‘no consensus’ based on the disagreement of the expert panel with the selection or rejection of these interventions in round one.
Figure 3. Composition of expert panel and response rate for each Delphi round
130 | Chapter 7