Page 176 - Sentinel lymph node biopsy in oral cavity cancer - Inne J. den Toom

Summary, general discussion and future perspectives REFERENCES 1. de Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Hofman PA, et al. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64(2):266-72. 2. Gourin CG, Conger BT, Porubsky ES, et al. The effect of occult nodal metastases on survival and regional control in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(7):1191-4. 3. Shah JP, Candela FC, Poddar AK. The patterns of cervical lymph node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity. Cancer. 1990;66(1):109-13. 4. Weiss MH, Harrison LB, Isaacs RS. Use of decision analysis in planning a management strategy for the stage N0 neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(7):699-702. 5. Ganly I, Patel S, Shah J. Early stage squamous cell cancer of the oral tongue--clinicopathologic features affecting outcome. Cancer. 2012;118(1):101-11. 6. Leemans CR, Tiwari R, Nauta JJ, et al. Regional lymph node involvement and its significance in the development of distant metastases in head and neck carcinoma. Cancer. 1993;71(2):452-6. 7. Boeve K, Schepman KP, Schuuring E, et al. High sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in a retrospective early stage oral cavity cancer cohort in the Northern Netherlands. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Mar 25. 8. Flach GB, Bloemena E, Klop WM, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically N0 T1-T2 staged oral cancer: the Dutch multicenter trial. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(10):1020-4. 9. Alkureishi LW, Ross GL, Shoaib T, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in head and neck squamous cell cancer: 5-year follow-up of a European multicenter trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(9):2459-64. 10. Pedersen NJ, Jensen DH, Hedback N, et al. Staging of early lymph node metastases with the sentinel lymph node technique and predictive factors in T1/T2 oral cavity cancer: A retrospective single-center study. Head Neck. 2016;38 Suppl 1:E1033-40. 11. Liu M, Wang SJ, Yang X, et al. Diagnostic Efficacy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of 66 Studies. PloS one. 2017;12(1):e0170322. 12. Murer K, Huber GF, Haile SR, et al. Comparison of morbidity between sentinel node biopsy and elective neck dissection for treatment of the n0 neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2011;33(9):1260-4. 13. Heuveling DA, van Schie A, Vugts DJ, et al. Pilot study on the feasibility of PET/CT lymphoscintigraphy with 89Zr-nanocolloidal albumin for sentinel node identification in oral cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(4):585-9. 14. Heuveling DA, Karagozoglu KH, Van Lingen A, et al. Feasibility of intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes with 89-zirconium-labelled nanocolloidal albumin PET-CT and a handheld high-energy gamma probe. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;8(1):15. 15. de Bree R, Dankbaar JW, de Keizer B. New Developments in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Procedure in Localized Oral Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;Jun 27. 16. Bae S, Lee HJ, Nam W, et al. MR lymphography for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with oral cavity cancer: Preliminary clinical study. Head Neck. 2018;40(7):1483-88. 17. Douek M, Klaase J, Monypenny I, et al. Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(4):1237-45. 18. Honda K, Ishiyama K, Suzuki S, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using computed tomographic lymphography in patients with early tongue cancer. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015;135(5):507-12. 19. Honda K, Ishiyama K, Suzuki S, et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Using Preoperative Computed Tomographic Lymphography and Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Patients With Localized Tongue Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;Jun 27. 20. Vera DR, Wallace AM, Hoh CK, et al. A synthetic macromolecule for sentinel node detection: (99m)Tc-DTPA-mannosyl-dextran. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(6):951-9. 174