Page 22 - The value of total hip and knee arthroplasties for patients

Chapter 1
28. Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten (www.lroi.nl).
29. van Steenbergen LN, Denissen GA, Spooren A, et al. More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Ar throplasty Register. Acta Or thop 2015;86:498-505.
30. LROI jaarraportage 2016 (http://www.lroirapportage.nl/media/pdf/PDF%20LROI%20annual%20 report%202017.pdf) (accessed 14-12-2017).
31. Keurentjes JC, Fiocco M, So-Osman C, et al. Patients with severe radiographic osteoarthritis have a better prognosis in physical functioning after hip and knee replacement: a cohort-study. PLoS One 2013;8:e59500.
32. Rolfson O, Karrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. JBone Joint SurgBr 2011;93:867-75.
33. Rolfson O, Salomonsson R, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Internet-based follow-up questionnaire for measuring patient-reported outcome after total hip replacement surgery-reliability and response rate. ValueHealth 2011;14:316-21.
34. Rolfson O, Strom O, Karrholm J, Malchau H, Garellick G. Costs Related to Hip Disease in Patients Eligible for Total Hip Ar throplasty. JAr throplasty 2011.
35. Rolfson O,Wissig S, van Maasakkers L, et al. Defining an International Standard Set of Outcome Measures for Patients With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: Consensus of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Working Group. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016;68:1631-9.
36. Dunbar MJ,Robertsson O,Ryd L,Lidgren L.Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty.Results of a survey of 3600 patients fromThe Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:339- 44.
37. Ayers DC, Zheng H, Franklin PD. Integrating patient-reported outcomes into orthopaedic clinical practice: proof of concept from FORCE-TJR. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:3419-25.
38. Franklin PD,Allison JJ,Ayers DC. Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement. JAMA 2012;308:1217-8.
39. Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:413-8.
40. Dowsey MM, Dieppe P, Lohmander S, Castle D, Liew D, Choong PF.The association between radiographic severity and pre-operative function in patients undergoing primary knee replacement for osteoarthritis. Knee 2012;19:860-5.
41. Cushnaghan J,Bennett J,Reading I,et al.Long-term outcome following total knee arthroplasty:a controlled longitudinal study. AnnRheumDis 2009;68:642-7.
42. Nilsdotter AK, Aurell Y, Siosteen AK, Lohmander LS, Roos HP. Radiographic stage of osteoarthritis or sex of the patient does not predict one year outcome after total hip arthroplasty. AnnRheumDis 2001;60:228-32.
43. Nilsdotter AK, Roos EM, Westerlund JP, Roos HP, Lohmander LS. Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement.Arthritis Rheum 2001;45:258-62.
44. Tilbury C, Haanstra TM, Leichtenberg CS, et al. Unfulfilled Expectations After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Surgery: There Is a Need for Better Preoperative Patient Information and Education. J Arthroplasty 2016;31:2139-45.
45. Haanstra TM, Tilbury C, Kamper SJ, et al. Can Optimism, Pessimism, Hope, Treatment Credibility and Treatment Expectancy Be Distinguished in Patients Undergoing Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty? PLoS One 2015;10:e0133730.
46. Tilbury C, Schaasberg W, Plevier JW, Fiocco M, Nelissen RG,Vliet Vlieland TP. Return to work after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:512-25.
47. Kuijer PP, de Beer MJ, Houdijk JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Beneficial and limiting factors affecting return to work after total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. JOccup Rehabil 2009;19:375-81.
20