Page 145 - WHERE WE WORK - Schlegelmilch

Ideas in place
Table 4.3 Results of GLM and regressions
Step 1
2
Variable
Intercept WTRANS Education Role
Work hours
Intercept WTRANS WFLEX Interaction Education Role
Work hours
Idea sharing (M4) a
Idea implementation (M5) b
Exp (B)
0.026*** 1.491*** 0.984 1.037
[95% CI]
[0.013, 0.053] [1.247, 1.782] [0.829, 1.166] [0.844, 1.273]
B
1.440*** 0.035 0.065** 0.123*** 0.005
(SE)
(0.150) (0.022) (0.021) (0.033) (0.003)
(Included as offsetc)
0.023*** [0.019, 0.047] 1.538*** [1.285, 1.841] 1.101 [0.922, 1.314] 0.770** [0.648, 0.916] 1.007 [0.846, 1.198] 1.041 [0.843, 1.286]
(Included as offsetc)
R2 change = 0.110*** 1.467*** (0.152) 0.037 (0.022)
-0.023 (0.023) 0.042 (0.023) 0.062** (0.021) 0.129*** (0.033) 0.004 (0.003)
R2 change = 0.010
Note. * p < .05, **p < .01. *** p < .001. N = 368. WTRANS = transparency; WFLEX = workplace flexibility; Education (1 = elementary school to 7 = master’s degree). Role (1 = employee, 2 = middle management, 3 = executive level). Interaction = WTRANS x WFLEX.
a Results are reported as log likelihoods (Negative binomial model). Also, (Pseudo) R2 are traditionally not discussed for generalized linear model (McCullagh & Nelder, 1989).
b Values are unstandardized regression coefficients (standard error estimates are listed in parentheses). All lower-order terms used in interactions were standardized prior to analysis.
c In the model with idea sharing as a DV, work hours were used as an offset (exposure) variable for this negative binomial model, therefore there is no coefficient.
Table 4.4 Conditional effects of transparency on idea sharing
Workplace flexibility
One SD below mean At the mean
One SD above mean
Exp (B) p
1.997 .000 1.538 .000 1.185 .154
95% CI
1.532, 2.602 1.285, 1.841 0.938, 1.495
Workplace transparency
143