Page 143 - Reduction of coercive measures

AAIDD. (2017, March). Definition of intellectual disability. Retrieved from http://aaidd.org/ intellectual-disability/definition#.UzLctah5N8E
Allen, D., Lowe K., Brophy S., & Moore, K. (2009). Predictors of restrictive reactive strategy use in people with challenging behavior. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 159-168. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00484.x
Allen, D., & Tynan, H. (2000). Responding to aggressive behavior: Impact of training on staff members’ knowledge and confidence. Mental Retardation, 38, 97-104. doi: 10.1352/0047-6765(2000)038<0097:RTABIO>2.0.CO;2
Arends, L. A. P., Blankman, K., & Frederiks, B. J. M. (2002). Evaluatie Wet Bopz, Deelonderzoek 10-3: Interne rechtspositie in de psychogeriatrie en de verstandelijk gehandicaptensector. Den Haag: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw).
Bailey, B. A., Hare, D. J., Hatton, C., & Limb, K. (2006). The response to challenging behavior by care staff: Emotional responses, attributions of cause and observations of practice. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 199-211. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2788.2005.00769.x
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
Bartlett, P. (2014). Reforming the deprivation of liberty safeguards (DOLS): What is it exactly that we want? European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 20. Retrieved from http:// webjcli.org/article/view/355
Blamires, K., Forrester-Jones, R., & Murphy, G. (2016), An investigation into the use of the deprivation of liberty safeguards with people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30, 714-726. doi: 10.1111/jar.12266
Bowring, D. L., Totsika, V., Hastings, R. P., Toogood, S., & Griffith, G. M. (2017). Challenging behaviours in adults with an intellectual disability: A total population study and exploration of risk indices. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 16-32. doi: 10.1111/ bjc.12118
Cairns, R., Richardson, G., Brown, P., Grant-Peterkin, H., Khondoker, M., Owen, G., Szmukler, G.,& Hotopf, M. (2011). Judgements about deprivation of liberty made by various professionals: comparison study. The Psychiatrics, 35, 344-349. doi: 10.1192/ pb.bp.110.033241
Carpenter, J., Langan, J., Patsios, D., & Jepson, M. (2014). Deprivation of liberty safeguards: What determines the judgements of best interests assessors? A factorial survey. Journal of Social Work, 14, 576-593. doi: 10.1177/1468017313504180
Chan J., Webber, L.S., & Hayward, B. (2013). Examining the use of restrictive interventions in respite services in an Australian jurisdiction. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20, 921-931. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2013.770357
Chan, J., LeBel, J., & Weber, L. (2012). The dollars and sense of restraints and seclusion. Journal of law and Medicine, 20, 73-81.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Cooper, S. A., Smiley, E., Jackson, A., Finlayson, J., Allan, L., Mantry, D., & Morrison, J. (2009). Adults with intellectual disabilities: Prevalence, incidence and remission of aggressive behaviour and related factors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 217-232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01127.x
Cudré-Mauroux, A. (2011). Self-efficacy and stress of staff managing challenging behaviors of people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 181- 189. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01401.x
Dacey, C. M., Nelson, W. M., & Stoeckel, J. (1999). Reliability, criterion-related validity and qualitative comments of the fourth edition of the Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scale with a young adult population with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 179–184. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1999.00187.x
Davis, P., & Scott, A. (1995). The effect of interviewer variance on domain comparisons. Survey Methodology, 21, 99–106.
References
141
R