Page 31 - Imaging of Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis in Hand Joints

Systematic review of advanced hand OA imaging
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies
Author (year) US studies
hand OA patients
healthy inclusion criteria for controls hand OA diagnosis
Age Female mean (range) %
Symptom duration Mean (range)
scored joints§ PIP + DIP
scoring system (REF)¶
Arrestier (2011)31 Iagnocco (2000)37 Iagnocco (2005)38 Keen (2008)40
55 57 110 7
61 61 65
CMC1 (1H) PIP + DIP
U 59
Keen (2008)41
Keen (2008)42
Keen (2010)43
Klauser (2012)44 Kortekaas (2010)45 Kortekaas (2011)46 Koutroumpas (2010)47 Mancarella (2010)60 Vlychou (2009)51 Wittoek (2010)52
37
36
36
33
55
55
18
25
22
38
- Symptomatic and CR or ACR ‘90
57* (53-66)° 58* (53-66)° 58* (53-66)° 64 (46-76)
83
86
86
85
87
86
89
92
91
87
4 yrs* (3-8)° NR
4 yrs* (2-9)° 6 yrs (2-11)
5 yrs* (0-55) 5 yrs* (0-55) 5 yrs (1-18)
7 yrs* (3-13)° 4 yrs (NR)
CMC1 + MCP + PIP + DIP
46 ACR ‘90 20 ACR ‘90
- Symptomatic and CR
- NR NR
(51-89) 93 (57-71) 76 (44-88) 100 NR NR
5 yrs (0-30) 1 yrs (0-3) 4 yrs (1-12) NR
R58
19 Symptomatic and CR or ACR ‘90
CMC1 + MCP + PIP + DIP
40, 41 40 R40 40, 58 R40
- Symptomatic and CR or ACR ‘90
CMC1 + MCP
+ PIP + DIP (1H)
- ACR ’90
- ACR ‘90
- ACR ‘90
- ACR ‘90
CMC1 + MCP
+ PIP + DIP (1H)
on CR 10 ACR ‘90
and erosion
CMC1 + MCP + PIP + DIP
U 40, 61
- ACR ‘90
- ACR ‘90
and CR
CMC1 + MCP + PIP + DIP
R62 U
62 (8)•
61 (9) •
61 (46-71) 65 (8)•
62 (51-71) 61 (6)•
CMC1 + MCP + PIP + DIP
10 yrs (5)•
PIP + DIP
CMC1 + MCP
+ PIP + DIP (1H)
U R40
CMC1 + MCP + PIP + DIP
MCP + PIP + DIP
29
2