Page 86 - Open versus closed Mandibular condyle fractures
P. 86
Chapter 3.2 Open
Table 1. Continued
Criteriab
12345678
Iizuka + + Iizuka + + Lima + + Petzel + + Raveh + + Sargent + + Spinzia + + Widmark + + Zrounba + + Chaithanyaa + + Chaudhary + + Choi + + Cortelazzi + + Derfoufi + + Eckelt + + Eckelt + + Hachem + + Kallela + + Meyer + + Petzel + + Rai + + Rallis + + Seemann + + Singh + + Sugiura + + Xie + + Zhang + +
+/- + +/- + +/- + - + + + +/- - + + + + +/- + - - + - +/- - + + +/- + +/- - + + +/- + +/- + + + +/- + + + +/- - + + + - + + +/- + + +
NA + - + NA+ +/- + NA + NA + NA + NA + NA + NA + +/- + NA+ +/- + + + NA + NA + NA + NA + +/- + +/- + +/- + NA+ +/- + +/- + NA + NA+ NA +
- + + +
- -
+ +/- - +/- - +
- +/- - +
- +
- -
+ +/- - +/- + +
- -
- +/- - +
- -
- + + + + +/- + +/- - +/- + -
+ +/- - +
- +/- - +/-
92
NA, not applicable
a +, yes; -, no; +/-, uncertain
b 1 = Clear study objective/question, 2 = Well- defined study protocol, 3 = Explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria for study participants, 4 = Specified time interval for patient recruitment, 5 = Consecutive patient enrollment, 6 = Clinically relevant outcomes, 7 = Prospective outcome data collection, 8 = High follow up rate/drop outs analysed
