Page 67 - Open versus closed Mandibular condyle fractures

Chapter 3.1 Open
Table 1. Continued
Authors
Tang
Trost Vesnaver Vogt
Yabe
Yang
Zhou Alexander Choi
Eckelt Hammer Hyde
Iizuka
Iizuka
Lima
Petzel Raveh Sargent Spinzia Widmark Zrounba Chaithanyaa
Occlusion Mouth % no opening malocclusion good (%)
88.2 86.1 80 97.1 94 ND 100 ND 100 ND 93 ND 92 ND 100 ND 80 96 100 4
ND 90 100 ND 100 89 ND ND ND ND 100 ND 100 ND 92 ND 80 62.5 89.50 ND 99.3 ND 80 ≥ 86.7
Range
>37 mm
to 40 mm
30–61 mm
ND
ND
32–61 mm
+/- 40 mm
16–50 mm
≥40 mm
<35 mm
≥35 mm
37–52 mm
>40 mm, 27–74 mm
22–50 mm
ND
ND
ND
35–56 mm
>40 mm, 18-50 mm
40–67 mm
21–56 mm
(≥46.7: 38-40 mm, 40: 30-35 mm)
Mean
(mm)
ND
ND
44
ND
ND
44
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
42
44
39
ND
ND
>40 mm 45
35.48 51 42.10 ND
ROM Pain
Chaudhary
Choi
Cortelazzi
Derfoufi
Eckelt
Eckelt
Hachem
Kallela
Meyer
Petzel
Rai93.3NDND NDNDND
Rallis ND
Seemann ND Singh ND Sugiura 94.4 Xie 80.6 Zhang 100
ND: not described
93.6 >40 mm, (6.4 < 35 mm (28–34 mm))
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND 42.8 Numbers given 96.3 38.3 ND 94.4 ND ND ND
100 ND 83.8 ≤ 91.9 100 ND ND ND ND 100 99.1 91.7 ND 100 72.7 90.9 94 100 ND ND
34–42 mm
(75.7 >38 mm)
35–48 mm
ND
≥30 mm
≥35 mm
≥30 mm, 68.2 >40 mm (82 >40 mm)
>40 mm
32–51 mm
36.13 ND 41 ND ND ND ND ND 49.5 ND
ND 100 ND ND ±100 ±100 ND ND 92.2 85.4 88.7 ND 90.9 90.9 100 90.9 100 100 Numbers given ND
(% unlimited)
(% free of pain)
ND ND 97.1 100 ND 59 ND ND ND ND ND 100 ND 94 ND 100 ND 80 95.5 90.9 ND 99.7 ND 100 ND 89.2 Numbers given 76.9 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 92.9 Numbers given 72 57.9 57.9 Numbers given ND ND ND
72