Page 154 - Open versus closed Mandibular condyle fractures

Problems in starting a randomized controlled trial
REFERENCES
1. Liu Y, Bai N, Song G, et al. Open versus closed treatment of unilateral moderately displaced mandibular condylar fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(2):169-173.
2. Berner T, Essig H, Schumann P, et al. Closed versus open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures: A meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2015;43(8):1404-1408.
3. Rozeboom AVJ, Dubois L, Bos RRM, Spijker R, de Lange J. Closed treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;46(4):456-464.
4. Rozeboom AVJ, Dubois L, Bos R, Spijker R, De Lange J. Open treatment of unilateral mandibular condyle fractures in adults: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 46: 1257-1266.
5. Van der Velden JM, Verkooijen HM, Ayoung-Afat D, et al. The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: A valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(1):96-102.
6. Verkooijen HML, Roes K, van Gils CH. \[Cohort multiple randomized controlled trial: a solution for the evaluation of multiple interventions\]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(17).
165
4.4