Page 86 - Breeding and regulatory opportunities, Renaud
P. 86



Chapter 3





3.2 Methodology




The case material to support this research was collected from mid- 2007 


through 2013. The description of the US organic seed sector builds on Renaud 

et al. (2014), which ofers an in-depth analysis of the development of the sector. 

The US study was initiated by identiication of stakeholder categories, the key 

stakeholders within each category, and the interests afected directly and 

indirectly by the evolving organic seed regulation (Reed et al., 2009). Interviews 


were conducted with individuals drawn from each stakeholder category to 

explore stakeholders’ perceptions of the draft organic seed regulation, their 

respective role in the process, and their perceptions of opportunities for or 

constraints to regulatory development. Seventy-four in-depth interviews 

(Kvale, 1996) with individuals and representatives of organizations, identiied by 


their high level of inluence within each stakeholder category, were conducted. 

The stakeholder categories identiied were organic certiiers (n=8), organic 

growers (n=40), organic food buyers (n=5), representatives of formal seed 

companies involved in organic and/or conventional seed production (n=10), 

administrative personnel (n=5), and non-proit organization representatives 


(n=6) with inluence. The information from the interviews was recorded and 

analysed manually by means of qualitative analysis, by applying content 

analysis (Patton, 1980), and discourse analysis (Krippendorf, 2004). The 

indings from these analyses are presented here in narrative form, in order to 


reveal the unfolding processes and interests that are shaping the emergent 

regulatory outcomes in each case.



The material for analysis of the organic seed sector in the EU (drawing on Döring 

et al., 2012) and in Mexico is based also on interviews with selected stakeholders 


in the organic seed sector (in the EU, n=12; and in Mexico, n=15), who were 

identiied through similar though less rigorous procedures as those outlined 

above for the US study. In all three jurisdictions, the respondents were asked 

to provide their perspectives on their respective organic seed regulations, and 

in the case of Mexico, also on the organic seed regulations in the country to 


which they export organic product. Responses were provided both in narrative 

form and, for speciic questions, also on a rank order. The questions included: 

(1) What are the primary motivations for you(r) organization to support the 

development of the organic seed sector? Ranking options here were: ecological 


seed production, inancial, farmer livelihood, biodiversity (genetic), imminent



68




   84   85   86   87   88