Page 64 - Breeding and regulatory opportunities, Renaud
P. 64



Chapter 2






noted that a major factor limiting wider use of organic seed was “an emerging 

organic seed industry that may, in certain cases, lack the diversity, quality, and 

quantity of organically grown seed to meet the needs of the organic production 


sector” (NOSB, 2008c). This conclusion was supported by the SOS survey which 

found that grower respondents ranked their reasons for not using organic seed 

as: (1) speciic variety not available (77 %), (2) insuicient quantity of seed (50 %), 

(3) lack of desirable traits (46%), and (4) price (40%) (Dillon and Hubbard, 2011).




Currently, many seed companies still supply organic farmers with conventionally 

produced but post-harvest untreated seed. If the organic seed rule were to 

be consistently enforced, seed companies would need to produce their most 

requested varieties in organic form. Seed company respondents, however, 

indicated that if they were to invest in organically produced seed, it was in their 


interest that the rule be strictly enforced, without exceptions. Since then the on- 

going discussions and inconsistent enforcement of the organic seed regulation 

has stimulated difering responses by seed companies. Respondents working 

for companies that had invested in producing proprietary conventional varieties 

in organic form (n=3) in order to support the ‘equivalent’ variety requirement, 


reported that they were in fact losing sales to lower-priced conventional varieties 

because of the lack of enforcement of the organic seed rule (Seed company 

interviews, 2007-2013). Members of companies that had decided to stay out of 

the organic seed market (n= 3) indicated that the market was not large enough 


for them to consider and potentially conlicted with other aspects of their 

business (e.g. because their business was associated with genetic engineering 

research or they had a chemical agriculture division).



A respondent working for one seed company stated there was widespread 


dissatisfaction within the seed industry with the consequences of the continuing 

lack of formal endorsement of the recommended regulation for technical 

decision-making such as how to produce organic seed, how to avoid seed- 

borne diseases without chemical treatments, how to manage weed competition 

without chemical herbicides, how to avoid lower yields in seed production, 


and how to select varieties appropriate for organic production systems (Seed 

company interview, 2009). Four of the 10 companies interviewed are recognized 

experts in conventional seed production. These respondents noted that not all 

conventional seed production norms are directly transferable to organic. For






46




   62   63   64   65   66