Page 112 - THE DUTCH TALKING TOUCH SCREEN QUESTIONNAIRE

Chapter 4
company; 2014.
32. Johnson J. Designing with the mind in mind. Waltham, MA: Elsivier Inc;
2014.
33. Johnson J, Roberts T, Verplank W, Smith D, Irby C, Beard M, et al.
The Xerox star: a retrospective. Computer 1989 Sep;22(9):11-26. [doi:
10.1109/2.35211]
34. NielsenJ,LandauerTK.Amathematicalmodelofthefindingofusability
problems. New York: ACM Press; 1993 Presented at: CHI’93 Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; April 24-29, 1993; Amsterdam, The Netherlands p. 206-213 URL: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=169059.169166 [doi:10.1145/169059.169166]
35. Norquist J, Chirovsky D, Munshi T, Tolley C, Panter C, Gater A. Assessing the comparability of paper and electronic versions of the EORTC QOL module for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study. JMIR Cancer 2017 May 12;3(1):e7 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/cancer.7202] [Medline: 28500019]
36. LundyJJ,CoonsSJ,AaronsonNK.Testingthemeasurementequivalence of paper and interactive voice response system versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 2014 Feb;23(1):229-237. [doi: 10.1007/s11136-013- 0454-1] [Medline: 23765449]
37. Campbell N, Ali F, Finlay AY, Salek SS. Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2015 Aug;24(8):1949-1961. [doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0937-3] [Medline: 25702266]
38. Muehlhausen W, Doll H, Quadri N, Fordham B, O’Donohoe P, Dogar N. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient- reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015;13:167. [doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0362-xMedline:]
39. Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health 2008 Mar;11(2):322-333 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x] [Medline: 18380645]
40. Horevoorts NJ, Vissers PA, Mols F, Thong MS, van de Poll-Franse LV. Response rates for patient-reported outcomes using web-based versus paper questionnaires: comparison of two invitational methods in older colorectal cancer patients. J Med Internet Res 2015;17(5):e111 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.3741] [Medline: 25953059]
41. van den Berg MH, Overbeek A, van der Pal HJ, Versluys AB, Bresters D, van Leeuwen FE, et al. Using web-based and paper-based questionnaires
106