Page 177 - It' about time: Studying the Encoding of Duration
P. 177

                                Appendix  List of published works Peer reviewed publications Maarseveen, J., Hogendoorn, H., Verstraten, F. A., & Paffen, C. L. (2017). An investigation of the spatial selectivity of the duration after-effect. Vision Research, 130, 67-75. Maarseveen, J., Paffen, C. L., Verstraten, F. A., & Hogendoorn, H. (2017). Representing dynamic stimulus information during occlusion. Vision Research, 138, 40-49. Maarseveen, J., Hogendoorn, H., Verstraten, F. A., & Paffen, C. L. (2018). Attention gates the selective encoding of duration. Scientific reports, 8(1), 1-8. Maarseveen, J., Paffen, C. L., Verstraten, F. A., & Hogendoorn, H. (2019). The duration aftereffect does not reflect adaptation to perceived duration. PloS one, 14(3). Peer reviewed abstracts Maarseveen, J., Hogendoorn, H., Verstraten, F., & Paffen, C. (2017). Attention mediates the encoding of duration. Journal of Vision, 17(10), 189-189. Maarseveen, J., Hogendoorn, H., Verstraten, F., & Paffen, C. (2016). Duration adaptation is position invariant. Journal of Vision, 16(12), 1129-1129. Maarseveen, J., Paffen, C., Verstraten, F., & Hogendoorn, H. (2015). Representing dynamic stimulus information during occlusion. Journal of Vision, 15(12), 1027- 1027. 176 


































































































   175   176   177   178   179