Page 190 - Personalised medicine of fluoropyrimidines using DPYD pharmacogenetics Carin Lunenburg
P. 190
Chapter 6
References
1. Scrip’s Cancer Chemotherapy Report. Scrip world pharmaceutical news London: PJB Publications Ltd. 2002.
2. Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J, et al. Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(21):4097-4106.
3. Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, et al. Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(8):2282-2292.
4. Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG. 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(5):330-338.
5. Mattison LK, Fourie J, Desmond RA, Modak A, Saif MW, Diasio RB. Increased prevalence of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency in African-Americans compared with Caucasians. Clinical Cancer Research. 2006;12(18):5491-5495.
6. Johnson MR, Diasio RB. Importance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in patients exhibiting toxicity following treatment with 5-fluorouracil. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2001;41:151-157.
7. Amstutz U, Froehlich TK, Largiader CR. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene as a major predictor of severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity. Pharmacogenomics. 2011;12(9):1321-1336.
8. Meulendijks D, Henricks LM, Sonke GS, et al. Clinical relevance of DPYD variants c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1639- 1650.
9. Amstutz U, Henricks LM, Offer SM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Genotype and Fluoropyrimidine Dosing: 2017 Update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;103(2):210-216.
10. Deenen MJ, Meulendijks D, Cats A, et al. Upfront Genotyping of DPYD*2A to Individualize Fluoropyrimidine Therapy: A Safety and Cost Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(3):227-234.
11. Henricks LM, Lunenburg CATC, de Man FM, et al. DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer: a prospective safety analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(11):1459-1467.
12. Lunenburg CATC, Henricks LM, Guchelaar HJ, et al. Prospective DPYD genotyping to reduce the risk of fluoropyrimidine-induced severe toxicity: Ready for prime time. Eur J Cancer. 2016;54:40- 48.
13. KNMP. Royal Dutch Society for the Advancement of Pharmacy. Fluorouracil/Capecitabine DPD gene activity score and guidelines. [Website]. 2015; https://kennisbank.knmp.nl/article/ farmacogenetica/2552-4893-4894.html. Accessed 05 May 2017.
14. NCI. National Cancer Institute: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. https:// evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf, 5 May 2017.
15. National Health Care Institute, The Netherlands. [Guideline for conducting economic evaluations
in health care. Appendix 1: Cost manual]. 2016. .
16. National Health Care Institute, The Netherlands. Price information of drugs. wwww.
medicijnkosten.nl, last accessed on 29 March 2018.
188