Page 140 - Personalised medicine of fluoropyrimidines using DPYD pharmacogenetics Carin Lunenburg
P. 140
Chapter 4
dose and non-selected patients on the standard dose. In another study, 4 *1/*2A did not develop grade ≥ 3 toxicity at 50% of the standard dose. One of them had previously developed grade ≥ 3 toxicity during the first cycle at the standard dose. One of them tolerated a dose increase to 60%, the other two did not tolerate a dose increase to 80% and 100% respectively. Of the 3 patients with genotype 1236A/1236A, one tolerated a standard dose. A second patient tolerated the treatment after dose reduction to 60% of the standard dose. Another study found a mean tolerated dose of 55% of the standard dose for 2x 1236A/1236A, 1x 1236A/2846T and 1x 2846T/2846T, although in this study a strong variation between patients (and genotypes) was found (17-100% of the standard dose).
Kinetic consequences:
Increase in the AUC of 5-fluorouracil by 103% (16x *1/*2A), 127% (1x 1236A/2846T) or 766% (1x 2846T/2846T).
52-80% decrease in clearance. 69-109% increase in half-life.
Literature
1. Rosmarin D et al. Genetic markers of toxicity from capecitabine and other fluorouracil-based regimens: investigation in the QUASAR2 study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1031-9.
2. Terrazzino S et al. DPYD IVS14+1 G>A and 2846A>T genotyping for the prediction of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity: a meta-analysis. Pharmacogenomics2013; 14:1255-72.
3. Magnani E et al. Fluoropyrimidine toxicity in patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase splice site variant: the need for further revision of dose and schedule. Intern Emerg Med 2013; 8:417-23.
4. Vulsteke C et al. Genetic variability in the multidrug resistance associated protein-1 (ABCC1/MRP1) predicts hematological toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC). Ann Oncol 2013; 24:1513-25.
5. van Kuilenburg AB et al. Evaluation of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics in cancer patients with a c.1905+1 G>A mutation in DPYD by means of a Bayesian limited sampling strategy. Clin Pharmacokinet 2012;51:163- 74.
6. Deenen MJ et al. Relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes in DPYD and toxicity and efficacy of capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17:3455-68.
7. Gross E et al. Strong association of a common dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene polymorphism with fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in cancer patients. PLoS ONE 2008;3:e4003.
8. Capitain O et al. The influence of fluorouracil outcome parameters on tolerance and efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Pharmacogenomics J 2008;8:256-67.
9. Sulzyc-Bielicka V et al. 5-Fluorouracil toxicity-attributable IVS14 + 1G > A mutation of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene in Polish colorectal cancer patients. Pharmacol Rep 2008;60:238-42.
10. Schwab M et al. Role of genetic and nongenetic factors for fluorouracil treatment-related severe toxicity: a prospective clinical trial by the German 5-FU Toxicity Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:2131-8.
11. Mercier C et al. Prospective phenotypic screening for DPD deficiency prior to 5-FU administration: Decrease in toxicity, not in efficacy. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(May 20 suppl):abstr 14556. (meeting abstract)
12. Jatoi A et al. Paclitaxel, carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer: phase II results of preliminary pharmacologic and molecular efforts to mitigate toxicity and predict outcomes: North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N0044). Am J Clin Oncol 2007;30:507-13
13. Magné N et al. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity and the IVS14+1G>A mutation in patients developing 5FU-related toxicity. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;64:237-40.
14. Saif MW et al. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (GPD) in GI malignancies: experience of 4-years. Pak J Med Sci Q 2007;23:832-9.
15. Boisdron-Celle M et al. 5-Fluorouracil-related severe toxicity: a comparison of different methods for the pretherapeutic detection of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Cancer Lett 2007;249:271-82.
16. Cho HJ et al. Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) polymorphisms in the Korean population for prediction of 5-fluorouracil-associated toxicity. Ther Drug Monit 2007;29:190-6.
17. Salgado J et al. Polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genes predict response and toxicity to capecitabine-raltitrexed in colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep 2007;17:325-8.
18. Morel A et al. Clinical relevance of different dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene single nucleotide polymorphisms on 5-fluorouracil tolerance. Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5:2895-904.
19. Largillier R et al. Pharmacogenetics of capecitabine in advanced breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:5496-502.
20. Salgueiro N et al. Mutations in exon 14 of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and 5-Fluorouracil toxicity in Portuguese colorectal cancer patients. Genet Med 2004;6:102-7.
138