Page 246 - Design meets Business:An Ethnographic Study of the Changing Work and Occupations of Creatives
P. 246
234 Design Meets Business
report to the National Science Foundation (NSF), Edited by: Krippen- dorff, K. 91–96. Raleigh, NC: School of Design, North Carolina State University.
Kronus, C. L. (1976). ‘The evolution of occupational power: An historical study of task boundaries between physicians and pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 3: 3–37.
L
Lampel, J., Lant, T., & Shamsie, J. (2000). Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organization science, 11(3), 263-269.
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24, 691–710.
Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Rituals and resistance: Membership dynamics in professional fields. Human Relations, 57: 115–143.
Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Informa- tion and organization, 18(3), 159-176.
Lingo, E. L., and O’Mahony, S. (2010). Nexus Work: brokerage on creative Projects. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 47–81.
Locke, K. D. (2000). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1999). Data logging in observation: Field- notes. Qualitative research, 3(Part 1).
Lofland, J., and Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
M
Maeda, J. (2017). Design in tech report. < https://designintech.report/>. Mager, B. (2004). Service Design: A Review. Cologne: Koln International
School of Design.
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Pacific. New York: Holt, Reinhart
and Winston.
Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton Univer-
sity Press.
Martin, R., & Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking
is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press.