Page 82 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 82
Chapter 5
of faith. According to Diller, Plantinga’s approach would avoid this problem. As alrea Barth’s concern.
apart from God’s self
esolve the tension with Barth’s vereign action of God, but function “within the realm of supernatural revelation and not independent from it.” This is for example where arguments for God’s existence can still be useful as Plantinga
differences can be “explained as the consequence of differences in the purpose and of their work.” He sums it up as follows: “Barth, as a Christian theologian, assumes the epistemology.”
remains a hypothetical issue whether Barth would really be satisfied by Diller’s proposed
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma RBG
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma
A. Plantinga, ‘Two Dozen (or so) Theistic Arguments,’ Alvin Plantinga
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma
80
