Page 47 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 47
Theological Responses to Plantinga’s A/C Model – Benno van den Toren 3 3.2.1 Conflict with the Principle of Uni-directional Epistemological Support
“Yet, in offering this solution, Plantinga still considers the ba higher up in our noetic structure and are not themselves properly basic.”
sensus divinitatis that “its capacity to bring us in touch with reality is evaluated entirely different by Calvin, basic.”
“The crucial point here is that there is a certain circularity (which does not ’ ’ directional.”
Plantinga’
points in Van den Toren’s critique call for a WCB
Christian Apologetics as Cross-Cultural Dialogue
Christian Apologetics as Cross-Cultural Dialogue
Christian Apologetics as Cross-Cultural Dialogue
Van den Toren refers to Plantinga’s own statement to this effect in WCD WCB
45
