Page 201 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 201
The key issue expressed in theological terms is: what is the relationship between God’s
13.3.3 What Is the Key Issue and What Position Does Plantinga Take?
“The model need take no stand on this issue, but it is part of much myself must make, a contribution that I can withhold.”
he model “could be developed with either an affirmation or a rejection of the Calvinist doctrine of ‘irresistible grace ’
God’s sovereignty? This has been the subject of a implications for Plantinga’s model. I want to come back in particular to Beilby’s proposed
by God’s prevenient process ideas in my discussion of Beilby’s response in
13.3.4 Beilby’s Suggested Approach
13
The Extended A/C Model
: “When we commit our lives to Christ, The Holy Spirit responds by reforming sensus divinitatis and our religious affections.” continues saying that “...the internal instigation of the Holy Spirit could either be thought
WCB, 257; see also Plantinga, ‘Internalism, Externalism, Defeaters and Arguments for Christian Belief,’ 383, 385
Epistemology as Theology WCB would deal with this tension; Helm, ‘Review of Warranted Christian Belief,’ Mind
Epistemology as Theology Epistemology as Theology
Epistemology as Theology
199
