Page 156 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 156
Chapter 9
this subject, and therefore sees Barth’s emphasis on God’s revelation as the source of truth ary to Plantinga’s model.
attention in Plantinga’s work for positive apologetics and a call for the use of arguments
WCB
“There is, however, a monumental issue which Plantinga does not discuss, do have warrant (in Plantinga’s sense). are true.”
to Plantinga’s book Warranted Christian Belief this point the ‘Inadequacy Thesis ’ which he defin
“The claim that the Reformed Epistemologist’s contention that belief in God likely in fact rranted.”
Plantinga’s model, and this still seems to be the case for the responses published since
Baker’s inadequacy thesis. A particularly important one is the point made by several
Swinburne, ‘Plantinga on Warrant’ Religious Studies
Baker, ‘Plantinga’s Reformed Epistemology: What’s the Question?’ International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Baker, ‘Plantinga’s Reformed Epistemology: What’s the Question?’
WCB ‘The Deliverances of Warranted Christian Belief,’ 11
‘Plantinga’s Reformed Epistemology: What’s the Question?’ Epistemology as Theology
154
