Page 119 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 119
Theological Responses to Plantinga’s A/C Model – James Beilby
de jure de facto But Plantinga’s claim was that there are no such de jure de facto
element to be added would be the role of the believer’s free will. He states: “If one allowed is explainable.”
variability
this be a matter of remaining sin? Beilby’s suggested approach leads to these questions
Beilby’s typical believers. Paradigmatic believers may have the resources to carry out little to alleviate it. This is why Plantinga’s model, emphasising that warranted belief is not dependent on arguments, is precisely of great value also to ‘typical’ or common
Epistemology as Theology Epistemology as Theology
117
7
