Page 73 - Children’s mathematical development and learning needs in perspective of teachers’ use of dynamic math interviews
P. 73

Impact of child and teacher factors on mathematical development
Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., Verhoeven, L., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2016). Teachers’ Sense of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Questionnaire. Radboud University.
Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.1.109
Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I. Y. F., & Georgiou, T. (2009). Exploring the validity of a teachers’ self-efficacy scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j. cedpsych.2008.08.001
Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998-2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10648-010-9141-8
Kling, G., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). Assessing basic fact fluency. Teaching Children Mathematics, 20(8), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.20.8.0488
Kolovou, A. (2011). Mathematical problem-solving in primary education (Doctoral dissertation). Freudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics Education.
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence leat to inflated self-assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.77.6.1121
Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.010
Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(3), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.009
Lund, T. (2012). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches: Some arguments for mixed methods research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(2), 155– 165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.568674
Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety towards mathematics achievement in mathematics. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 520– 540. https://doi.org/10.2307/749772
Maloney, E. A., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Math anxiety: Who has it, why it develops, and how to guard against it. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16(8), 404–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tics.2012.06.008
Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self- concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416. htpps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8624.2005.00853.x
Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? (pp. 29–47). Paul H. Brookses.
McWilliams, M. A., Nier, J. A., & Singer, J. A. (2013). The implicit self and the specificity- matching principle: Implicit self-concept predicts domain-specific outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 474–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2012.09.014
Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1129–1167. https://doi. org/10.3102/0034654309337522
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement programme (primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3), 273–303. https://doi.org/10.1076/0924-3453(200009)11:3;1-G;FT273
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2002). Teachers’ beliefs and behaviors: What really matters?. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 3–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44735709
2
 71
 













































































   71   72   73   74   75