Page 63 - Advanced concepts in orbital wall fractures

References
1. Alinasab B, Ryott M, Stjarne P: Still no reliable consensus in management of blow-out fracture. Injury 45: 197-202, 2014
2. Dubois L, Steenen SA, Gooris PJJ, et al.: Controversies in orbital reconstruction - I. Defect- driven orbital reconstruction: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44: 308-315, 2015
3. Dubois L, Steenen SA, Gooris PJJ, et al.: Controversies in orbital reconstruction - II. Timing of post-traumatic orbital reconstruction: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44: 433- 440, 2015
4. Gosau M, Schoneich M, Draenert FG, et al.: Retrospective analysis of orbital floor fractures
- Complications, outcome and review of literature. Clin Oral Invest 15: 305-313, 2011 C3
5. Ramieri G, Spada MC, Bianchi SD, et al.: Dimensions and volumes of the orbit and orbital fat in posttraumatic enophthalmos. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29: 302-311, 2000
6. Noser H, Hammer B, Kamer L: A method for assessing 3D shape variations of fuzzy regions and its application on human bony orbits. J Digit Imaging 23: 422-429, 2010
7. Andrades P, Hernandez D, Falguera MI, et al.: Degrees of tolerance in post-traumatic orbital volume correction: the role of prefabricated mesh. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67: 2404-2411, 2009
8. Cai EZ, Koh YP, Hing ECH, et al.: Computer-assisted navigational surgery improves outcomes in orbital reconstructive surgery. J Craniofac Surg 23: 1567-1573, 2012
9. Dubois L, Schreurs R, Jansen J, et al.: Predictability in orbital reconstruction: a human cadaver study. Part II: navigation-assisted orbital reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43: 2042-2049, 2015
10. Dubois L, Essig H, Schreurs R, et al.: Predictability in orbital reconstruction. A human cadaver study. Part III: implant-oriented navigation for optimized reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43: 2050-2056, 2015
11. Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schon R, et al.: Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104: 1-10, 2007
12. Novelli G, Tonellini G, Mazzoleni F, et al.: Virtual surgery simulation in orbital wall reconstruction: integration of surgical navigation and stereolithographic models. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42: 2025-2034, 2014
13. Rana M, Chui CHK, Wagner M, et al.: Increasing the accuracy of orbital reconstruction with selective laser-melted patient-specific implants combined with intraoperative navigation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73: 1113-1118, 2015
14. Schramm A, Suarez-Cunqueiro MM, Rücker M, et al.: Computer-assisted therapy in orbital and mid-facial reconstructions. Int J Med Robot 5: 111-124, 2009
15. Gui H, Yang H, Zhang S, et al.: Mirroring tool: the simplest computer-aided simulation technology? J Craniofac Surg 26: 2115-2119, 2015
16. Pierrefeu A, Terzic A, Volz A, et al.: How accurate is the treatment of midfacial fractures by a specific navigation system integrating ‘‘mirroring’’ computational planning? Beyond mere average difference analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73: 315.e1-315.e10, 2015
17. Ferrario V, Sforza C, Ciusa V, et al.: The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59: 283-288, 2001
18. Sanders DA, Chandhoke TK, Uribe FA, et al.: Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Prog Orthod 15: 26, 2014
19. Thornhill R, Gangested SW: Facial attractiveness. Trends Cog Sci 3: 452-460, 1999
20. Jansen J, Schreurs R, Dubois L, et al.: Orbital volume analysis: validation of a semi-automatic
software segmentation method. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11: 11-18, 2016
21. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, et al.: Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16: 187-198, 1997
Virtual mirroring
61