Page 99 - Peri-implant health: the effect of implant design and surgical procedure on bone and soft tissue stability
P. 99
LONG-TERM EFFECT OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND PATIENTS' FACTORS ON CRESTAL BONE LOSS AT DENTAL IMPLANTS. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
97
4
Table 5: Summary of implant survival % and mean bone loss (expressed as positive value in mm), standard deviation and standard error for each surface roughness and corresponding proportion of implants estimated to loose bone >1 mm, >2 mm and >3 mm. T-test was used for statistical comparison with p≤0.05 being statistically significant.
Surface roughness
Mean bone loss (mm) [95% CI; SD; SE]
T-test
Proportion % implants bone loss
Implant survival %
All studies Unknown surface Rough Moderately rough Minimally rough
1.01 [1.00-1.03; 0.89; 0.0092] 1.15 [1.11-1.19; 0.81; 0.021] 1.04 [1.00-1.08; 1.01; 0.0189] 1.01 [0.98-1.04; 0.87; 0.0148] 0.86 [0.81-0.90; 0.84; 0.0212]
] p=0.28
] p<0.00001
] p=0.0002 ]
p<0.00001
] p<0.00001
]
p<0.00001
49 18 49 18 51 20 51 18 43 14
5 97.3 5 95.8 5 96.4 5 98.4 3 97.6
>1 >2 >3 mm mm mm
