Page 66 - Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Adhesions- New insights in prevention and consequences

Chapter 3
References
1. Menzies, D. and H. Ellis, Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1990. 72(1): p. 60-3.
2. Menzies, D., Peritoneal adhesions. Incidence, cause, and prevention. Surg Annu, 1992. 24 Pt 1: p. 27-45.
3. Parker, M.C., et al., Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12,584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001. 44(6): p. 822-29; discussion 829-30.
4. Menzies, D., et al., Small bowel obstruction due to postoperative adhesions: treatment patterns and associated costs in 110 hospital admissions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2001. 83(1): p. 40-6.
5. Tingstedt, B., J. Isaksson, and R. Andersson, Long-term follow-up and cost analysis following surgery for small bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions. Br J Surg, 2007. 94(6): p. 743-8.
6. Schnuriger, B., et al., Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a review of the literature. Am J Surg. 201(1): p. 111-21.
7. Lang, R.A., et al., Polyvinyl alcohol gel prevents abdominal adhesion formation in a rabbit model. Fertil Steril, 2007. 88(4 Suppl): p. 1180-6.
8. Muller, S.A., et al., A hydrogel for adhesion prevention: characterization and efficacy study in a rabbit uterus model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2010. 158(1): p. 67-71.
9. Weis, C. and E.K. Odermatt, A-part gel-an efficient adhesion prevention barrier. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2007. 82(1): p. 174-82.
10. Brown, C.B., et al., Adept (icodextrin 4% solution) reduces adhesions after laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril, 2007. 88(5): p. 1413-26.
11. Verco, S.J., et al., Development of a novel glucose polymer solution (icodextrin) for adhesion prevention: pre-clinical studies. Hum Reprod, 2000. 15(8): p. 1764-72.
12. Wiseman, D.M., J.R. Trout, and M.P. Diamond, The rates of adhesion development and the effects of crystalloid solutions on adhesion development in pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril, 1998. 70(4): p. 702-11.
13. Zuhlke, H.V., et al., [Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir, 1990: p. 1009-16.
14. Hooker, G.D., B.M. Taylor, and D.K. Driman, Prevention of adhesion formation with use of sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane in a rat model of ventral hernia repair with polypropylene mesh--a randomized, controlled study. Surgery, 1999. 125(2): p. 211-6.
15. van den Tol, P., et al., Icodextrin reduces postoperative adhesion formation in rats without affecting peritoneal metastasis. Surgery, 2005. 137(3): p. 348-54.
16. van der Wal, J.B. and J. Jeekel, Biology of the peritoneum in normal homeostasis and after surgical trauma. Colorectal Dis, 2007. 9 Suppl 2: p. 9-13.
17. Luijendijk, R.W., et al., Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. Ann Surg, 1996. 223(3): p. 242-8.
18. Bhardwaj, R. and M.C. Parker, Impact of adhesions in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis, 2007. 9 Suppl 2: p. 45-53.
19. Metwally, M., et al., Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006(2): p. CD001298.
20. Beck, D.E., et al., A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum, 2003. 46(10): p. 1310-9.
21. Fazio, V.W., et al., Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum, 2006. 49(1): p. 1-11.
64