Page 130 - Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Adhesions- New insights in prevention and consequences

Chapter 7
References
1. de Dombal, F.T., S.E. Clamp, and K.S. Wardle, Measuring surgical performance in acute abdominal pain: some reflections from international studies. Eur J Surg, 1997. 163(5): p. 323-9.
2. Hesselink, Trends in Surgery. SIG Health Care Information, 1995. ISBN90-707555-46-7.
3. Drake, F.T., et al., Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State’s
Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg, 2012. 256(4): p. 586-94.
4. Hale, D.A., et al., Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg, 1997. 225(3): p.
252-61.
5. Andersson, R.E., Small bowel obstruction after appendicectomy. Br J Surg, 2001. 88(10): p. 1387-91.
6. Leung, T.T., et al., Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: what is the true incidence? Ann Surg, 2009. 250(1): p. 51-3.
7. Tingstedt, B., et al., Late abdominal complaints after appendectomy--readmissions during long-term follow-up. Dig Surg, 2004. 21(1): p. 23-7.
8. van Goor, H., Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis, 2007. 9 Suppl 2: p. 25-34.
9. Stanciu, D. and D. Menzies, The magnitude of adhesion-related problems. Colorectal Dis, 2007. 9 Suppl 2: p. 35-8.
10. van der Wal, J.B.C. and J.A. Halm, Chronic abdominal pain: the role of adhesions and benefit of laparoscopic adhesionlysis. Gyn Surg, 2006. 3: p. 168-174.
11. Ellis, H., et al., Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 1999. 353(9163): p. 1476-80.
12. Menzies, D. and H. Ellis, Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1990. 72(1): p. 60-3.
13. Eypasch, E., et al., Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg, 1995. 82(2): p. 216-22.
14. Nieveen Van Dijkum, E.J., et al., Validation of the gastrointestinal quality of life index for patients with potentially operable periampullary carcinoma. Br J Surg, 2000. 87(1): p. 110- 5.
15. Onders, R.P. and E.A. Mittendorf, Utility of laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain. Surgery, 2003. 134(4): p. 549-52; discussion 552-4.
16. Paajanen, H., K. Julkunen, and H. Waris, Laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain: a prospective nonrandomized long-term follow-up study. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2005. 39(2): p. 110-4.
17. Swank, D.J., et al., Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial. Lancet, 2003. 361(9365): p. 1247-51.
18. Sauerland, S., T. Jaschinski, and E.A. Neugebauer, Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010(10): p. CD001546.
19. Swank,H.A.,etal.,Short-andlong-termresultsofopenversuslaparoscopicappendectomy. World J Surg, 2011. 35(6): p. 1221-6; discussion 1227-8.
20. Kapischke, M., et al., Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy--quality of life 7 years after surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011. 396(1): p. 69-75.
21. Dowson, H.M., et al., Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Br J Surg, 2008. 95(7): p. 909-14.
22. Levrant, S.G., E.J. Bieber, and R.B. Barnes, Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 1997. 4(3): p. 353-6.
23. Lundorff, P., et al., Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril, 1991. 55(5): p. 911-5.
128