Page 117 - Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Adhesions- New insights in prevention and consequences
P. 117

                                Biological and synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair
24. Baptista, M.L., et al., Abdominal adhesions to prosthetic mesh evaluated by laparoscopy and electron microscopy. J Am Coll Surg, 2000. 190(3): p. 271-80.
25. Binnebosel, M., et al., Morphology, quality, and composition in mature human peritoneal adhesions. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2008. 393(1): p. 59-66.
26. Epstein, J.C., et al., Human peritoneal adhesions show evidence of tissue remodeling and markers of angiogenesis. Dis Colon Rectum, 2006. 49(12): p. 1885-92.
27. Roy, S., et al., Reactive oxygen species and EGR-1 gene expression in surgical postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Surg, 2004. 28(3): p. 316-20.
28. Schreinemacher, M.H., et al., Degradation of mesh coatings and intraperitoneal adhesion formation in an experimental model. Br J Surg, 2009. 96(3): p. 305-13.
29. Chelala, E., et al., Eighty-five redo surgeries after 733 laparoscopic treatments for ventral and incisional hernia: adhesion and recurrence analysis. Hernia, 2010. 14(2): p. 123-9.
30. Zinther, N.B., P. Wara, and H. Friis-Andersen, Intraperitoneal onlay mesh: an experimental study of adhesion formation in a sheep model. Hernia, 2010. 14(3): p. 283-9.
31. Petter-Puchner, A.H., et al., Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration. Surg Endosc, 2011. 25(10): p. 3245-52.
32. Poulose, B.K., et al., Physiologic properties of small intestine submucosa. J Surg Res, 2005. 123(2): p. 262-7.
33. Clarke, K.M., et al., Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs. J Surg Res, 1996. 60(1): p. 107-14.
34. Connor, J., et al., Retention of structural and biochemical integrity in a biological mesh
supports tissue remodeling in a primate abdominal wall model. Regen Med, 2009. 4(2): p. 6 185-95.
35. Mulier, K.E., et al., Comparison of Permacol and Strattice for the repair of abdominal wall defects. Hernia. 15(3): p. 315-9.
36. Gaertner, W.B., M.E. Bonsack, and J.P. Delaney, Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg, 2007. 11(10): p. 1275-85.
37. Stanwix, M.G., et al., Abdominal ventral hernia repair with current biological prostheses: an experimental large animal model. Ann Plast Surg, 2012. 66(4): p. 403-9.
38. Schug-Pass, C., et al., The use of composite meshes in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias: are there differences in biocompatibily?: experimental results obtained in a laparoscopic porcine model. Surg Endosc, 2009. 23(3): p. 487-95.
39. Schug-Pass, C., et al., A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. Surg Endosc, 2006. 20(3): p. 402-9.
115
 















































































   115   116   117   118   119