Page 87 - Craniomaxillofacial Implant Surgery - Jeroen P.J. Dings

Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: a survey on the quality of life
5 4 3 2 1 0
4,1
3,9 3,9
3,8
4,4
4,2
4,2
3,9
Softness material
Wearing comfort
3,5
3,5
3,6 3,3
Comfortableness
Orbital prostheses Nasal prostheses
Hardness material Auricular prostheses
Natural feeling
54 3,5 3,8 4,4 4,2
33
2 1 0
4,5 4,7 4,6
4,4 4,3 4,3
Symmetrical countenance
Prothesefit and form
Adequate fitwhilemoving Adequate fitinneutral expression
Orbital prostheses Nasal prostheses
Naturalform
Auricular prostheses
3,7
5
5 43
2 1 0
4,5
3,6
4,3
4,2 3,5
4,2
4,3 3,6
4
Colour
2,9
2,8 3,3
General satisfaction
Similarity autogenous skin colour
Tendency for deteriotation in Overflow colour prosthesis colour to surrounding tissue
Orbital prostheses Nasal prostheses Auricular prostheses
5 4,4 4
3
2
4,2 4,3
4,5 4,5
Orbital prostheses
Easiness of placement
4,4
3,8 4,6 4,3
Auricular prostheses Easiness of removal
User friendliness
1 0
Nasal prosthese Uniformity in placement
Figure 1. Outcome Likert scales on wearing comfort, prosthesis fit and form, color, and user friendliness for different anatomic locations
85
Likert- scale